Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

South African Parliament Votes to Confiscate White-Owned Land Without Compensation

posted by cmn32480 on Wednesday February 28 2018, @01:17PM   Printer-friendly
from the Apartheid-2.0 dept.

Mykl writes:

As reported in news.com.au, South Africa's Parliament have voted to "expropriate" land from white farmers with no compensation.

From TFA:

The motion was brought by Julius Malema, leader of the radical Marxist opposition party the Economic Freedom Fighters, and passed overwhelmingly by 241 votes to 83 against. The only parties who did not support the motion were the Democratic Alliance, Freedom Front Plus, Cope and the African Christian Democratic Party
...
"The time for reconciliation is over. Now is the time for justice," Mr Malema was quoted by News24 as telling parliament. "We must ensure that we restore the dignity of our people without compensating the criminals who stole our land."
...
Mr Malema has been leading calls for land confiscation, forcing the ANC to follow suit out of fear of losing the support of poorer black voters. In 2016, he told supporters he was "not calling for the slaughter of white people‚ at least for now"

This policy has been tried in other African countries before, most recently Zimbabwe, with disastrous results. The farms appropriated usually fail rapidly, leading to food shortages and economic destruction. Will South Africa be able to avoid repeating history, or is it about to slide into 3rd World status?

Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
South African Parliament Votes to Confiscate White-Owned Land Without Compensation | Log In/Create an Account | Top | 151 comments | Search Discussion
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

  • (Score: 2) by lgw on Wednesday February 28 2018, @07:29PM (1 child)

    by lgw (2836) on Wednesday February 28 2018, @07:29PM (#645330)

    I see you have a Final Solution to the SJW problem.

    Won't work - ultimately it's always a competitive marketplace of ideas, and the only way to win is to have more compelling arguments for your ideas - not merely rely on them being "obviously right" or any such nonsense. Sure, the SJWs themselves aren't interested in listing to rational argument, but they're not the audience, everyone else is.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  
    Total Score:   2  

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday February 28 2018, @11:19PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday February 28 2018, @11:19PM (#645480)

    Sure, the SJWs themselves aren't interested in listing to rational argument, but they're not the audience, everyone else is.

    No one is going to listen, if you use dogwhistles like SJW, and you think that somehow they are boats that are leaning in the water.

    listing:List
            A vessel's angle of lean or tilt to one side, in the direction called roll. Typically refers to a lean caused by flooding or improperly loaded or shifted cargo (as opposed to 'heeling', which see).

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glossary_of_nautical_terms#L [wikipedia.org]

    Since it may be lefties you are attempting to slight with your pathetic attempts at literacy, no doubt they will list to port. The "obliviously right" obviously list to starboard.