Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Thursday March 01 2018, @05:37PM   Printer-friendly
from the drink-up-it'll-do-you-good dept.

Using two different measurement methods, researchers from North Carolina State University conducted a two-year study of North Carolina's Jordan Lake in which they monitored toxic algal blooms. The researchers found that multiple cyanotoxins from toxic algal blooms are present year-round, albeit in very low concentrations. Their findings could improve the ability to predict toxic blooms.

Freshwater algal blooms have increased due to nutrients from sources such as fertilizers and other agricultural runoff entering the water. While every algal bloom isn't toxic -- some algal species can produce both toxic and nontoxic blooms -- toxic blooms can cause problems for swimmers and other recreational users in the form of rashes or allergic reactions.

"We've confirmed both that the toxins are there year-round and that multiple toxins are there simultaneously but in very low levels," says Astrid Schnetzer, associate professor of marine, earth and atmospheric sciences at NC State and corresponding author of a paper describing the research. "First, let's be clear that the presence of the toxins doesn't affect drinking water -- treatment plants scrub all of that out. Secondly, the amounts of toxins we did find are about an order of magnitude below safe levels, so that's also good news."

[...] The researchers analyzed the samples for five different toxins, and found four of them: microsystin, anatoxin-a, clindrospermopsin, and β-N-methylamino-L-alanine (BMAA). Multiple toxins were detected at 86 percent of the sampling sites and during 44 percent of the sampling events.

[..] "In the future, we want to have a better predictive capability regarding these blooms as well as the ability to identify new emerging toxins. The data may also help us determine risk from chronic low-level exposures, as well as tease out what risks derive from exposure to multiple toxins at once."

Journal Reference:

Daniel Wiltsie, Astrid Schnetzer, Jason Green, Mark Vander Borgh, Elizabeth Fensin. Algal Blooms and Cyanotoxins in Jordan Lake, North Carolina. Toxins, 2018; 10 (3): 92 DOI: 10.3390/toxins10020092


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 02 2018, @01:40AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 02 2018, @01:40AM (#646152)

    Somewhere I read about someone fighting an algae bloom with hydrogen peroxide.

    I researched it and tried it in my aquarium and it works.

    In the case of a 55-gallon tank, I am now adding about a cup of tap water, per day - to offset evaporation - with about 5 ml of 3%, OTC-grade hydrogen peroxide added. That's about 5-10 drops. A very small amount.

    The change was visible, in a week or two. The algae growing on the back of the tank started completely disappearing from the glass, along the upper half of the tank. The upper half of the tank seemed to benefit the most, even though my aquarium is driven by two pumps; I surmise that the pump was blowing the peroxide-enriched water across the algae bloom and increasing the exposure.

    But even at the bottom of the tank I started to see the algae recede from the rocks and coral I had on the bottom of the tank.

    It's not all gone yet - I've only been doing this for a month or two - but I am confident that if I keep it up I will eventually eliminate the algae entirely.

    Obviously it is going to require more than 5-10 drops per day to address the problem represented by an entire river of runoff, but I hope that this will help you get a start on it.

    ~childo