Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Friday March 02 2018, @09:32AM   Printer-friendly

A plane being developed by Paul Allen could lower the cost of launching to low-Earth orbit:

Rockets have been the way to get satellites into orbit since the dawn of the space age. But Microsoft co-founder Paul Allen hopes to shake that up with help from the world's biggest airplane.

"Stratolaunch" is a 500,000-pound beast with twin fuselages and a wingspan of 385 feet. Allen's Seattle-based company is developing it as a platform for lifting rockets into the stratosphere before launching them into space. It's seen as a cheaper, more reliable route to low-Earth orbit (LEO) — the sweet spot for many kinds of satellites.

The plane is still in development and has yet to fly, but last December it taxied out onto the runway at the Mojave Air & Space Port in Mojave, California. In another test last Sunday, it hit a new top taxi speed of 46 miles per hour [40 knots]. If all goes according to plan, the plane will take its first test flight next year. As to when Stratolaunch might begin commercial operations, no date has been given.

Twitter video of rollout.

Also at Flying Magazine.

Previously: Stratolaunch: The World's Largest Plane Rolls Out


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 4, Interesting) by deimtee on Friday March 02 2018, @07:08PM (1 child)

    by deimtee (3272) on Friday March 02 2018, @07:08PM (#646550) Journal

    That's the same thing really. It all converts to delta v.

    5% of delta v plus another few % for launching from preferred lattitude plus a few % saving a lot of low altitude drag.
    Due to the rocket equation a 10% reduction in required delta v is significant.

    One way to calculate how useful it would be is to find its altitude and speed at rocket launch (call it Rich's figure of 0.3 km/s and altitude of 20 km), and find out how much of its fuel a ground based rocket has used by that point. I don't know the answer, but I would not be surprised by something on the order of 20 to 30%.

    Everything in rocketry is so close to the edge of feasibility that it might be enough that you could cut a stage from the vehicle. Even if the remaining stage(s) have to be slightly bigger/better there could still be major savings in that.

    (Hmm. just worked out that 20 km of altitude is about 0.5 km/s of delta v. The savings from a plane launch could be quite significant.)

    --
    If you cough while drinking cheap red wine it really cleans out your sinuses.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +2  
       Interesting=2, Total=2
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   4  
  • (Score: 2) by c0lo on Friday March 02 2018, @11:32PM

    by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Friday March 02 2018, @11:32PM (#646700) Journal

    One way to calculate how useful it would be is to find its altitude and speed at rocket launch (call it Rich's figure of 0.3 km/s and altitude of 20 km), and find out how much of its fuel a ground based rocket has used by that point. I don't know the answer, but I would not be surprised by something on the order of 20 to 30%.

    Wake up the Kerbals, they will know.

    --
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford