Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Monday March 05 2018, @05:59PM   Printer-friendly
from the more-you-tighten-your-grip dept.

Turkey, positioned geopgraphically on the edge of Europe and politically inside of NATO, has been heading in a troubling direction for some time in regards to speech. Crackdowns on dissent and even open speech are increasing and Internet communications are the specific focus of some of the recent actions. Coming up is legislation intended to curb the Internet (WWW) in ways similar to how television and radio have already been limited:

Having already brought Turkey's mainstream media to heel, and made considerable headway in rolling back Turkish democracy, the government of President Recep Tayyip Erdogan has set its sights on a seemingly innocuous target: a satellite television preacher named Adnan Oktar.

[...] "It is just about control," said Kerem Altiparmak, a human rights and media lawyer. "Considering what has been happening in Turkey, I have no doubt this is a hegemonic power, controlling newspapers, TV and the judiciary, that is now out to control the [I]nternet sector."

All the restrictions are made that much easier through increased use of and dependence on centralized services like Facebook by the remaining opposition.

Source : Erdogan's Next Target as He Restricts Turkey's Democracy: The Internet


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Informative) by PartTimeZombie on Monday March 05 2018, @08:22PM (8 children)

    by PartTimeZombie (4827) on Monday March 05 2018, @08:22PM (#648146)

    Yep, and this wasn't really a problem for anyone else until he invaded Poland

    Apart from anybody the Nazis didn't like of course. [wikipedia.org] If you take the time to look at the Wiki article, you will note Dachau was opened in 1933, pretty much as soon as the Nazis won power.

    If they accused someone of a crime, the Special Courts [wikipedia.org] made sure a conviction was obtained.

    Let's not pretend the Nazis were the good guys until they invaded Poland OK?

    Your point about Western leaders failing to hold Erdogan to account is a good one though. The problem is he has been until now a reliable ally of the US (in particular) so has been allowed to get away with whatever he wants.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Informative=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 2) by Grishnakh on Monday March 05 2018, @08:31PM (7 children)

    by Grishnakh (2831) on Monday March 05 2018, @08:31PM (#648153)

    I did mention oppression of minority groups in my follow-on post, which I would have put in the post you replied to if this site had a proper "edit" functionality (i.e., I should be able to edit a post within 30 seconds of posting it; I realized my omission within 5 seconds on this one).

    As for them being "good guys", I never said that, just that the people of Germany were getting what they voted for. Remember, every nation gets the government it deserves. A bad government in a nation is a direct effect of bad choices by the people of that nation in almost every instance (exceptions for things like invasions and occupations of course).

    • (Score: 3, Interesting) by PartTimeZombie on Monday March 05 2018, @10:15PM (2 children)

      by PartTimeZombie (4827) on Monday March 05 2018, @10:15PM (#648216)

      Fair enough.

      I am not sure I'm convinced by the whole "people get the government they deserve" argument though, propaganda being as pervasive as it is.

      I recently argued with someone online about the awful propaganda TV commercials the largest company in my country is playing at the moment, but he just thought it was a perfectly normal "PR campaign", as if there is a difference.

      As far as the Nazis go, they received 30% or so of the vote in the 1933 elections, then used violence, intimidation and bribery to gain total power, so maybe 30% of Germans got what they deserved, the rest got what they were given.

      • (Score: 2) by Grishnakh on Tuesday March 06 2018, @01:34AM (1 child)

        by Grishnakh (2831) on Tuesday March 06 2018, @01:34AM (#648287)

        When some minority group uses violence to gain total power, it's the responsibility of the other people to use violence if necessary to prevent this or take it back.

        The problem with people who disagree with the "people get the government they deserve" quote is that they never really have another answer to it. If the people of a nation aren't to blame for its government, or responsible for it, then who is? (Again, barring extreme situations like occupation by a foreign power with superior strength; e.g., if the US decides to invade and occupy St. Kitts and Nevis (population 46,000) and set up a new government there, there's not much those people can do about it, and they certainly can't be blamed for it.)

        • (Score: 2) by dry on Wednesday March 07 2018, @04:44AM

          by dry (223) on Wednesday March 07 2018, @04:44AM (#648882) Journal

          People can be mistaken, vote in a total bullshitter and then figure it out. Unluckily it usually takes about 4 years before you can vote them out, if your lucky and get the chance. The worst won't give the people a chance to vote them out or remove them in other ways, at least easily.
          Many countries also have some basic laws written out as a Constitution that takes more then 50%+1 of the people who voted to change. Other countries can see their basic rights disappear really quick.

    • (Score: 2) by janrinok on Tuesday March 06 2018, @05:56AM (3 children)

      by janrinok (52) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday March 06 2018, @05:56AM (#648377) Journal

      which I would have put in the post you replied to if this site had a proper "edit" functionality

      Or, you could read what you have written, think about it, and pause before pressing the enter key. Just sayin'.

      • (Score: 2) by maxwell demon on Tuesday March 06 2018, @07:37AM (1 child)

        by maxwell demon (1608) on Tuesday March 06 2018, @07:37AM (#648405) Journal

        What's the point in pausing before you start a new line?

        --
        The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
        • (Score: 2) by janrinok on Tuesday March 06 2018, @01:50PM

          by janrinok (52) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday March 06 2018, @01:50PM (#648487) Journal
          Fair point - I have a script that allows me to press the Enter key on the numeric keypad to submit. This means I don't have to move my hand from the keyboard to the mouse to press the 'Submit' button. I had forgotten that it was a local thing...
      • (Score: 2) by Grishnakh on Tuesday March 06 2018, @05:31PM

        by Grishnakh (2831) on Tuesday March 06 2018, @05:31PM (#648579)

        Do you refuse to edit anything you ever write, even though you're on a computer? Perhaps you should apply that logic to everything you do on a computer: once written, you can never change it. If you write some code and it has a bug, you're not allowed to use an editor to modify the code, you just have to live with it.

        The whole reason computers (and "word processors" - specialized computers) took over from typewriters back in the 80s was because it was easy to edit documents. Are you saying this is a mistake?

        Maybe you should disable the "back" button on your phone too while you're at it, and disable the backspace key on your keyboard.