Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Thursday March 08 2018, @01:57AM   Printer-friendly
from the protecting-children dept.

France to set legal age of sexual consent as 15

France plans to fix the legal age of sexual consent as 15, meaning sex with someone younger than that would be considered rape.

Equality Minister Marlène Schiappa welcomed the move, which follows advice from doctors and legal experts. Currently, prosecutors must prove sex with someone under 15 was forced in order to bring rape charges. The change comes amid uproar over two recent cases of men accused of having sex with 11-year-old girls.

Under the existing legislation, if there is no violence or coercion proved, offenders may only be charged with sexual abuse of a minor and not rape. This has a maximum sentence of five years in prison and a fine of €75,000 (£66,000; $87,000).

[...] The government is to approve the new age limit as part of a package of other laws against sexual violence and harassment in the coming weeks. It had been discussing whether to set the age as 13 or 15, which is what groups fighting violence against children had campaigned for.

Les commentaires déplorables.

Also at The Local, NPR, and SBS.

Related: French Porn Star Hits Back at President Emmanuel Macron's Plans to Censor Online Porn


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday March 08 2018, @09:24AM (7 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday March 08 2018, @09:24AM (#649411)

    A hormone level/balance test should not be that intrusive.

    Sample some blood, see how the levels and balance of various hormones hold up towards the averages of a child (no sexual hormones), a teen (pretty much messed up :-) ) and an adult (balanced hormones within a certain bandwidth).

    And it will provide a nice way of finding the (future) predators/wackos with their messed up hormones that are causing most of the problems right now anyway...

  • (Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Thursday March 08 2018, @03:02PM (5 children)

    by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Thursday March 08 2018, @03:02PM (#649504) Journal

    Uh-huh - yeah - I'm with you on that! It's not invasive at all to take a blood sample! Nope, not even a little bit! Bleed that bitch dry! We've got to decide whether she is old enough to rape, or if our Good Old Boy should have thrown her back. Those young ones are catch and release, right? </sarcasm>

    Seriously, man - the girl says she was raped, and you want to stick her with a needle? This makes less sense than poking her already abused vagina with a swab in search of semen. Oh, wait, the rapist says it was consensual? Oh, well then, it's alright - bleed the bitch!!

    • (Score: 2) by ewk on Friday March 09 2018, @08:39AM (4 children)

      by ewk (5923) on Friday March 09 2018, @08:39AM (#649891)

      No woman ever lied... Sure....

      --
      I don't always react, but when I do, I do it on SoylentNews
      • (Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Friday March 09 2018, @02:37PM (3 children)

        by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Friday March 09 2018, @02:37PM (#649963) Journal

        Nor has any man ever lied. More to the point, no woman has ever been raped by a man, right? Every case ever investigated was found to be trumped up.

        I've got an idea. In this age of social justice, and putting down white hetero males, why don't we just have a judicial lottery system? 50% of rape suspects are put to death, and 50% are exonerated, and the victims are put to death instead. Notice, I limited that to white hetero males, because only white hetero males have raped every gender, race, nationality, and culture they have ever met. /sarcasm

        • (Score: 2) by ewk on Friday March 09 2018, @03:02PM (2 children)

          by ewk (5923) on Friday March 09 2018, @03:02PM (#649985)

          Please tell me what you have been snorting... that way I know what to avoid.

          Social justice is neither, so sarcasm or not, your rant totally missed my point of applying the right amount of due diligence where it is needed.

          --
          I don't always react, but when I do, I do it on SoylentNews
          • (Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Friday March 09 2018, @03:38PM (1 child)

            by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Friday March 09 2018, @03:38PM (#650022) Journal

            Did I neglect my /sarcasm tag?

            • (Score: 2) by ewk on Friday March 09 2018, @05:42PM

              by ewk (5923) on Friday March 09 2018, @05:42PM (#650111)

              Nope, hence my remark of "so sarcasm or not".

              But, if your reaction was an extension/elaboration to mine, then my ability to recognize it as such, needs a bit of fine tuning. :-)

              --
              I don't always react, but when I do, I do it on SoylentNews
  • (Score: 2) by tangomargarine on Thursday March 08 2018, @04:47PM

    by tangomargarine (667) on Thursday March 08 2018, @04:47PM (#649543)

    A hormone level/balance test should not be that intrusive.

    Not that intrusive for the court, maybe. Although I would also disagree with that.

    It's much more intrusive for meeting people on the street than a simple ID check.

    --
    "Is that really true?" "I just spent the last hour telling you to think for yourself! Didn't you hear anything I said?"