Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Thursday March 08 2018, @05:38PM   Printer-friendly
from the push-comes-to-shove dept.

According to TorrentFreak (TF) entertainment coalitions such as the Alliance for Creativity and Entertainment (ACE) are continuing to threaten developers of Kodi addons:

The MPA, Netflix, Amazon, and dozens of other content companies are ramping up the pressure on a third-party Kodi addon developer. Last year, JSergio123 was warned by the Alliance for Creativity and Entertainment to cease his activities and sign a confidential settlement agreement. He did not and now he's coming under pressure to comply. But what are ACE's demands?

[...] JSergio123's reluctance to sign an agreement with ACE hasn't gone unnoticed by the anti-piracy group. In a letter dated March 5, 2018 and signed by Kelly Klaus of US-based lawfirm Munger, Tolles & Olson, the developer is reminded of what transpired last year and what is expected of him moving forward.

"I understand that ACE counsel have discussed with you various of your "Addon" software applications and related software and services, including URLResolver (collectively, the "[redacted] Addons") and other actions you have undertaken to induce and contribute to the mass infringement of the ACE members' copyrighted works," Klaus writes. "I also understand that ACE counsel have provided you with a proposed settlement agreement, pursuant to which you would end your infringing activities and provide cooperation and other consideration in exchange for ACE agreeing not to pursue legal action against you arising out of your infringing activities. To date, you have not signed the settlement agreement."

JSergio123's precise reasons for not signing the settlement agreement aren't being made public. However, TorrentFreak understands that some of the terms presented to addon developers last year have caused considerable concern. In some cases they are difficult to meet, not to mention unpalatable to the people involved. They include promises to ensure that specified addons and indeed any developed in the future can no longer infringe copyright. For those that scrape third-party sources, this could prove impossible to absolutely guarantee. This could effectively put developers out of the addon game – legitimate or otherwise – for good. TF is also informed that ACE demanded a high-level of cooperation, including that the developers should supply what amounts to a full confession, detailing all the projects they've been involved in, past and present.

Meanwhile, Dish Network is continuing to pursue a lawsuit against TVAddons and ZemTV.

Related: MPAA Chief Focuses Attention on the Kodi Platform
Kodi Panic in the UK and Popularity in North America
Kodi Add-on Library "TVAddons" Disappears After Lawsuit
Hollywood Strikes Back Against Illegal Streaming Kodi Add-Ons
Kodi Returns to its Roots With an Xbox One Release
Two New Lawsuits Against Makers of "Pirate Streaming Devices"


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by DannyB on Thursday March 08 2018, @06:16PM (12 children)

    by DannyB (5839) Subscriber Badge on Thursday March 08 2018, @06:16PM (#649599) Journal

    Looking at your list. Why does Arizona have a limit of two (2) dildos per household, but no such limit on cars, computers or guns? Cars and Computers can be dangerous weapons. Just ask anyone who has been hit over the head with a computer.

    But Kodi Addons, wow. This IS a serious danger to society. How many people per year die from Kodi Addons? (or from Disney movies?)

    --
    The lower I set my standards the more accomplishments I have.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Interesting=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 2) by takyon on Thursday March 08 2018, @07:02PM

    by takyon (881) <takyonNO@SPAMsoylentnews.org> on Thursday March 08 2018, @07:02PM (#649622) Journal

    Kodi Addons should be honored because they strip away the ad-laden web interfaces of terror-supporting streaming sites!!!

    --
    [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday March 08 2018, @07:22PM (4 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday March 08 2018, @07:22PM (#649637)

    Why does Arizona have a limit of two (2) dildos per household?

    You must be kidding. Aren't you?

    • (Score: 2) by All Your Lawn Are Belong To Us on Thursday March 08 2018, @07:55PM

      by All Your Lawn Are Belong To Us (6553) on Thursday March 08 2018, @07:55PM (#649661) Journal

      Why does Arizona have a limit of two (2) dildos per household?

      You must be kidding. Aren't you?

      Debunked here. [phoenixnewtimes.co] Though as a teenager living in Arizona I remember hearing it as well... Actually I think it was a cap on the possession of the number of porn videos one could possess. The main adult store in the Valley of the Sun, the Castle, was in rural Maricopa County between the borders of Tempe and Phoenix (back when there was actually space in between them) where supposedly the laws on that were not enforced.

      However, in Texas, the sale of one is illegal. [state.tx.us] Though likely unenforceable now, to believe Wikipedia.
      In Alabama, though, it is illegal and was upheld by the court. [wikipedia.org] You can own one, just not sell one. [findlaw.com]

      --
      This sig for rent.
    • (Score: 2) by DannyB on Thursday March 08 2018, @09:16PM (2 children)

      by DannyB (5839) Subscriber Badge on Thursday March 08 2018, @09:16PM (#649714) Journal

      I was not kidding. But, it looks like this may be debunked, if it ever was true [phoenixnewtimes.com].

      I got it long ago from somewhere online. Googling just now, I can find multiple references. Whether it is actually true or not, I cannot say.

      --
      The lower I set my standards the more accomplishments I have.
      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday March 08 2018, @11:42PM (1 child)

        by Anonymous Coward on Thursday March 08 2018, @11:42PM (#649776)

        Actually, the law read, "Only two dildos from the Great State of Arizona can be in the US Senate at any one time." Kind of a Flakey law, but there it is. Hope no one goes raising Cain over this.

        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday March 08 2018, @11:50PM

          by Anonymous Coward on Thursday March 08 2018, @11:50PM (#649779)

          Actually, the law read, "Only two dildos from the Great State of Arizona can be in the US Senate at any one time." Kind of a Flakey law, but there it is. Hope no one goes raising McCain over this.

          There. FTFY.

  • (Score: 3, Touché) by stretch611 on Thursday March 08 2018, @08:18PM (5 children)

    by stretch611 (6199) on Thursday March 08 2018, @08:18PM (#649686)

    Because stuffing 2 dildos in a person is a perfectly reasonable act.

    However, 3 at a time is immoral and wrong. ;)

    --
    Now with 5 covid vaccine shots/boosters altering my DNA :P
    • (Score: 2) by Lester on Thursday March 08 2018, @09:57PM

      by Lester (6231) on Thursday March 08 2018, @09:57PM (#649732) Journal

      Yeah. Two shoes is reasonable. Three is absurd, let alone two pairs.

    • (Score: 2) by choose another one on Thursday March 08 2018, @10:22PM (3 children)

      by choose another one (515) Subscriber Badge on Thursday March 08 2018, @10:22PM (#649740)

      Um, the post says _per household_ not per person.

      Arguably two dildoes per three (or more) people is even more wrong...

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday March 08 2018, @11:43PM (2 children)

        by Anonymous Coward on Thursday March 08 2018, @11:43PM (#649778)

        2 per 3 can kind of work if double dildos count as one.

        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 09 2018, @12:42AM (1 child)

          by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 09 2018, @12:42AM (#649790)

          I wonder if anyone thought of creating a multi-dildo to get around such laws. A single device with multiple different business ends. Kind of like the charger cables which split into half a dozen different connectors.