Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Thursday March 08 2018, @07:15PM   Printer-friendly
from the no-more-blind-corners? dept.

Stanford researchers develop technique to see objects hidden around corners

A driverless car is making its way through a winding neighborhood street, about to make a sharp turn onto a road where a child's ball has just rolled. Although no person in the car can see that ball, the car stops to avoid it. This is because the car is outfitted with extremely sensitive laser technology that reflects off nearby objects to see around corners.

This scenario is one of many that researchers at Stanford University are imagining for a system that can produce images of objects hidden from view. They are focused on applications for autonomous vehicles, some of which already have similar laser-based systems for detecting objects around the car, but other uses could include seeing through foliage from aerial vehicles or giving rescue teams the ability to find people blocked from view by walls and rubble.

Confocal non-line-of-sight imaging based on the light-cone transform (DOI: 10.1038/nature25489) (DX)

Whereas light detection and ranging (LIDAR) systems use such measurements to recover the shape of visible objects from direct reflections, NLOS [(Non Line Of Sight)] imaging reconstructs the shape and albedo of hidden objects from multiply scattered light. Despite recent advances, NLOS imaging has remained impractical owing to the prohibitive memory and processing requirements of existing reconstruction algorithms, and the extremely weak signal of multiply scattered light. Here we show that a confocal scanning procedure can address these challenges by facilitating the derivation of the light-cone transform to solve the NLOS reconstruction problem. This method requires much smaller computational and memory resources than previous reconstruction methods do and images hidden objects at unprecedented resolution. Confocal scanning also provides a sizeable increase in signal and range when imaging retroreflective objects. We quantify the resolution bounds of NLOS imaging, demonstrate its potential for real-time tracking and derive efficient algorithms that incorporate image priors and a physically accurate noise model. Additionally, we describe successful outdoor experiments of NLOS imaging under indirect sunlight.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by hemocyanin on Friday March 09 2018, @12:26AM

    by hemocyanin (186) on Friday March 09 2018, @12:26AM (#649788) Journal

    As an IANAD (doctor) I wonder if it will work that way. In my rudimentary way of thinking, I can place my hand on a piece of metal that's 100 F for as long as I want and never suffer any sort of burn, but if I do the same with one that's at 500 F, I will almost instantly get a severe burn. So it seems there is some threshold effect where I could be exposed to massive amounts of energy at some particular level and experience no ill effect, but once a threshold is crossed, the effect is immediate. I suppose there is a middle ground -- if I grab a piece of metal at 120 F and don't let go, how long will it take to get a burn? If I grab that piece of metal for one second and let go for 10 -- can I do that essentially forever without getting burned?

    So blah blah blah -- what do we have here? Lasers that are safe no matter how long you stare at them? Ones that are instantly damaging? Or ones that will cause damage with sufficient continuous exposure?

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2