Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 10 submissions in the queue.
posted by martyb on Friday March 09 2018, @02:18PM   Printer-friendly
from the going-to-need-lots-of-volunteers-to-build-the-block-list dept.

Rhode Island is the latest US state to discuss mandatory censorship of web content, at first targeting pornography:

Rhode Island Democratic state Senators Frank Ciccone (@senatorciccone) and Hanna Gallo (@hannagallo27) have proposed grandstanding, unworkable legislation, "Relating to Public Utilities and Carriers—Internet Digital Blocking" which would mandate the state's ISPs to identify all the pornography on the [I]nternet, and then block it for all Rhode Islanders, unless those Rhode Islanders specifically requested their porn to be unblocked and paid $20 for the privilege.

These proposals fly in the face of the observation that automated pornography filters don't work and that even the manual ones are neither practical, reliable, nor scalable.

Source : Rhode Island proposes blocking all online porn and charging $20 to unblock it. Boing Boing.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by NewNic on Friday March 09 2018, @06:40PM (4 children)

    by NewNic (6420) on Friday March 09 2018, @06:40PM (#650150) Journal

    You have an amazingly incorrect definition of "continent"

    He or she shows their true nature: to the AC, Latinos (Mexicans) don't count.

    --
    lib·er·tar·i·an·ism ˌlibərˈterēənizəm/ noun: Magical thinking that useful idiots mistake for serious political theory
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 1) by khallow on Friday March 09 2018, @06:51PM (3 children)

    by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Friday March 09 2018, @06:51PM (#650156) Journal
    Nor do Canadians.
    • (Score: 2) by NewNic on Friday March 09 2018, @07:22PM (2 children)

      by NewNic (6420) on Friday March 09 2018, @07:22PM (#650172) Journal

      As far as I can tell, Canada has had prohibition across the nation, between 1918 to 1920, leaving Mexico as the only North American country that has never had national prohibition.

      --
      lib·er·tar·i·an·ism ˌlibərˈterēənizəm/ noun: Magical thinking that useful idiots mistake for serious political theory
      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 09 2018, @09:46PM (1 child)

        by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 09 2018, @09:46PM (#650246)

        Here's a list of all the countries in North Americahttps://www.countries-ofthe-world.com/countries-of-north-america.html/ [countries-ofthe-world.com]:
        Antigua and Barbuda
        Bahamas
        Barbados
        Belize
        Canada
        Costa Rica
        Cuba
        Dominica
        Dominican Republic
        El Salvador
        Grenada
        Guatemala
        Haiti
        Honduras
        Jamaica
        Mexico
        Nicaragua
        Panama
        Saint Kitts and Nevis
        Saint Lucia
        Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
        Trinidad and Tobago
        United States of America (USA)

        I think you need to extend your research a bit to see if any of the others listed have had prohibition during their existence as a country.

        • (Score: 2) by NewNic on Friday March 09 2018, @11:11PM

          by NewNic (6420) on Friday March 09 2018, @11:11PM (#650295) Journal

          I don't need to extend my research. The fact that there is one country that has never had nation-wide prohibition shows the lie that was posted before.

          Also, excluding Canada and the USA, I think that all of those countries are predominantly non-white population. Mostly Latino, some Afro-Carribean.

          --
          lib·er·tar·i·an·ism ˌlibərˈterēənizəm/ noun: Magical thinking that useful idiots mistake for serious political theory