Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Friday March 09 2018, @07:09PM   Printer-friendly
from the roomers-rumors? dept.

There are two kinds of horror stories about Airbnb. When the home-sharing platform first appeared, the initial cautionary tales tended to emphasize extreme guest (and occasionally host) misbehavior. But as the now decade-old service matured and the number of rental properties proliferated dramatically, a second genre emerged, one that focused on what the service was doing to the larger community: Airbnb was raising rents and taking housing off the rental market. It was supercharging gentrification while discriminating against guests and hosts of color. And as commercial operators took over, it was transforming from a way to help homeowners occasionally rent out an extra room into a purveyor of creepy, makeshift hotels.

Several studies have looked into these claims; some focused on just one issue at a time, or measured Airbnb-linked trends across wide swaths of the country. But a recent report by David Wachsmuth, a professor of Urban Planning at McGill University, zeroes in on New York City in an effort to answer the question of exactly what home sharing is doing to the city.

Source: https://www.citylab.com/equity/2018/03/what-airbnb-did-to-new-york-city/552749/


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Informative) by Virindi on Friday March 09 2018, @10:43PM (3 children)

    by Virindi (3484) on Friday March 09 2018, @10:43PM (#650284)

    Oh boo-hoo, you have to ride with Blacks and Mexicans.

    That is not at all the problem with the bus, jeez. The bus is slow; routes are crap and require many transfers. By the time you wait for a train, wait for a train to transfer, wait for a bus, wait for another bus, etc. you have spent double or more (sometimes MUCH more) the amount of time it would have taken to drive. Not to mention that it is expensive.

    DC Metro system was designed for two things: commuting (to the city center) and tourists. General getting around is an afterthought.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Informative=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 1) by Ethanol-fueled on Friday March 09 2018, @10:51PM (2 children)

    by Ethanol-fueled (2792) on Friday March 09 2018, @10:51PM (#650287) Homepage

    Well, I agree with you. But good luck getting everybody else to agree with you!

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday March 10 2018, @02:38AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Saturday March 10 2018, @02:38AM (#650355)

      Build your own? /sarcasm

      No. Wait. Better idea. The government can build huge roads straight through from A to B. Then anyone, including public transport can quickly get around. As long as they pay the toll to the private operator the road is leased to.

    • (Score: 2) by Adamsjas on Saturday March 10 2018, @02:56AM

      by Adamsjas (4507) on Saturday March 10 2018, @02:56AM (#650359)

      Well if Uber and Lyft are doing well, you can assume some others agree as well.