Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Saturday March 10 2018, @07:01PM   Printer-friendly
from the left-the-freezer-door-open-again dept.

University Hospitals notifies 700 fertility patients of freezer "fluctuation" and potential damage to stored eggs and embryos

University Hospitals has notified about 700 fertility patients and their families that the frozen eggs and embryos they had stored at one of its hospitals may have been damaged over the weekend when the temperature rose in a storage tank.

The problem, in one of two large freezers preserving specimens at the UH Fertility Center housed at the Ahuja Medical Center in Beachwood, was discovered on Sunday morning. It occurred some time after staff left the previous afternoon, according to Patti DePompei, president of UH Rainbow Babies & Children's Hospital and MacDonald Women's Hospital.

The liquid nitrogen freezer held about 2,000 egg and embryo specimens, according to Dr. James Liu, chairman of the department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at UH Cleveland Medical Center. Some patients had more than one sample stored, and some of the samples were provided as long ago as the 1980's.

Also at Newsweek.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Kell on Sunday March 11 2018, @04:57AM (7 children)

    by Kell (292) on Sunday March 11 2018, @04:57AM (#650773)

    This just cuts a knife to my heart. I had cells frozen prior to surgery that rendered me infertile - I've got plenty stored up, but if they were suddenly wiped out... I will never be a parent I don't even want to think of it. Time to start the IVF sooner rather than later, I think.

    --
    Scientists ask questions. Engineers solve problems.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by Runaway1956 on Sunday March 11 2018, @06:38AM (4 children)

    by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Sunday March 11 2018, @06:38AM (#650801) Journal

    If you are in that position - then why on earth do you have all of your cells relying on a single point of failure? That point has been made already in this discussion. Demand that half of your cells be maintained in some other location. For added insurance, demand that your cells be stored in 4 or more locations.

    Of course, if the aliens invade tomorrow, and nuke us into the stone age, no number of locations on earth will ensure survival. Demand lunar storage!!

    • (Score: 2) by FatPhil on Sunday March 11 2018, @11:53AM

      by FatPhil (863) <{pc-soylent} {at} {asdf.fi}> on Sunday March 11 2018, @11:53AM (#650891) Homepage
      "single point of failure"

      There's a term for that, specifically for cases like this. It's "in one basket".
      --
      Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves
    • (Score: 2) by Kell on Monday March 12 2018, @03:37PM (2 children)

      by Kell (292) on Monday March 12 2018, @03:37PM (#651369)

      You're assuming that this is not something I have already done... I chose my fertility clinic in part because they did offer multiple storage locations for samples. But that doesn't mean that some systemic problem won't effect samples... pays to not be too long about it.

      --
      Scientists ask questions. Engineers solve problems.
      • (Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Monday March 12 2018, @03:44PM (1 child)

        by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Monday March 12 2018, @03:44PM (#651377) Journal

        Fair enough. And, of course, even if you aren't relying on - uhh - "fresh eggs" from your own ovaries, the clock is still ticking. For my part, I was 32 when my first son was born. Here I am, almost 62, and the kid still hasn't grown up. I may never know my adult sons.

        Bahhh, let me be more fair. My youngest son has matured pretty well. I don't know where he's going yet, but he is going places.

        • (Score: 2) by Kell on Tuesday March 13 2018, @12:00PM

          by Kell (292) on Tuesday March 13 2018, @12:00PM (#651782)

          Unfortunately, I wasn't issued the standard equipment when I was born, so alas my partner and I have to go through a surrogate. Convenient 'cus I'm career-focused, and he'll be a stay-at-home dad... and also convenient because it's not limited by my age (I'm late thirties) - our surrogate is younger. On the down side, it means I won't get that most basic of experiences: carrying my own child. Sigh.

          --
          Scientists ask questions. Engineers solve problems.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday March 11 2018, @04:11PM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday March 11 2018, @04:11PM (#650945)

    You won't be a parent if no one will take your sperm either. And supposing you had someone who would, the recipients time window is much shorter than the time some people have had their sperm stored.
    Fish or cut bait. You want to be a parent bad enough to end up with a mongoloid?

    • (Score: 2) by Kell on Monday March 12 2018, @03:39PM

      by Kell (292) on Monday March 12 2018, @03:39PM (#651372)

      Well, you have no idea what my age or marital status is. Yes, I have a partner for my cells, and no age isn't a factor (at least, not in the near few years). Practically everyone who goes down this path gets educated on the exigencies of the situation.

      --
      Scientists ask questions. Engineers solve problems.