Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Tuesday March 13 2018, @09:56AM   Printer-friendly
from the good-news,-everyone! dept.

TechRights reports

Unified Patents, Inc. Puts $2,000 Bounties on Prior Art, Seeking to Defang Texan Patent Trolls That Are Active In Spite of TC Heartland

There's now money in invalidation of patents (not just for defendants' lawyers in courts or petitioners at PTAB [USA's Patent Trial and Appeal Board]) rather than endless pursuits of more and more patents; Unified Patents offers the money, targeting patent trolls for the most part.

There are two things that are dying out/ebbing away in the US: software patents and patent trolls. There's a strong correlation between those two things, but for the most part they're now being tackled by Alice and TC Heartland, respectively. Both are landmark decisions by the US Supreme Court and they impact the USPTO [US Patent and Trademark Office]/PTAB and courts, respectively (the latter is also impacted by Alice).

There's an upcoming conference that covers PTAB and includes Unified Patents. We are very supportive of Unified Patents, behind which there are reasonable people who care about patent quality; they're -not- patent maximalists and some are in fact scholars/academics.

Based on this update from yesterday, there's now a $2,000 bounty on patent prior art which can stop a patent troll that's based in Texas. To quote:

On March 9, 2018, Unified issued a new contest in Patroll (a prior art crowdsourcing platform) with a $2,000 prize for winning prior art submissions that invalidate US Patent 7,526,477. The '477 patent, directed to a method and apparatus for enhancing electronic reading by identifying relationships between sections of electronic text, has been asserted in multiple litigations by Red River Innovations, LLC, a Texas-based NPE [non-practicing entity].

Another similar (same cash award) bounty was announced yesterday:

On March 9, 2018, Unified issued a new Patroll (prior art crowdsourcing platform) contest with a $2,000 prize for a winning prior art submission that invalidates US Patent 7,177,838. The '838 patent, directed to a method and apparatus for conducting electronic commerce transactions using electronic tokens, has been asserted in multiple litigations by GTX Corp., an NPE.

As a reminder of its accomplishments, Unified Patents also published this reminder yesterday--the latest reminder of how it successfully uses PTAB to thwart bad patents/software patents:

On March 9, 2018, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board issued a final written decision in Unified Patents Inc. v. Digital Stream IP, LLC, IPR2016-01749 invalidating claims 1, 4, 6-13, 20, and 22 of U.S. Patent 6,757,913, owned and asserted by Digital Stream IP, LLC. The '913 Patent, which describes a wireless music and data transceiver system, has been asserted in multiple litigations against such companies as Best Buy, GM, Mercedes, Nissan, Honda, and Sirius XM. Only Sirius XM remains in active litigation as the majority of these cases settled after Unified filed its IPR.

Good riddance. A lot of these are exploiting a ridiculous court in Texas. They know that time is running out because after TC Heartland it's a lot harder to keep court cases there. [...] the Eastern Texas District Court/Eastern District of Texas (TXED/EDTX) is losing its status yet again. Patent trolls and bullies are unable to wage legal war in there.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by JoeMerchant on Tuesday March 13 2018, @06:04PM (3 children)

    by JoeMerchant (3937) on Tuesday March 13 2018, @06:04PM (#651908)

    Last time I was working for a "patent factory" we were actively encouraged to "let the IP attorneys worry about prior art," and not spend any of our valuable time doing more than a cursory glance at what's already out there.

    --
    🌻🌻 [google.com]
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday March 14 2018, @01:11AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday March 14 2018, @01:11AM (#652098)

    It is surprising that they had you look at all. Knowingly infringing on a patent is worth triple damages to the holder. As of 2016 that got a lot easier to collect:

    https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-06-13/u-s-supreme-court-eases-way-for-larger-patent-damage-awards [bloomberg.com]

  • (Score: 2) by FatPhil on Wednesday March 14 2018, @01:29AM

    by FatPhil (863) <pc-soylentNO@SPAMasdf.fi> on Wednesday March 14 2018, @01:29AM (#652104) Homepage
    Ditto here.

    All the better, lawyers get the blame when something goes wrong.
    --
    Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday March 14 2018, @04:45AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday March 14 2018, @04:45AM (#652154)

    I wonder how the patent attorneys convinced someone that their exorbitant hourly rates were somehow less than the inventors/developers/engineers doing the work. That highly paid patent attorney adds jack shit to a patent in the way of prior art references, considering they do bugger all work themselves anyway beyond obfuscating the text into 'pateneze' and adding stupid claims that are clearly anticipated by prior art.