Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by CoolHand on Tuesday March 13 2018, @07:25PM   Printer-friendly
from the strike-up-a-conversation-about-censorship dept.

TEDxBrussels has had its license revoked after an organizer dragged the controversial performance artist, Deborah De Robertis, off the stage by force during her presentation there. The parent organization recently has issued a statement on this incident at TEDxBrussels

Today at TEDxBrussels, an independently organized TEDx event, speaker and performance artist Deborah De Robertis was forcibly removed from the stage by one of the event's organizers, who objected to the talk's content.

From Mashable:

According to the TEDxBrussels website, the presenter, artist Deborah De Robertis, was in the middle of a piece addressing past censorship of her artwork. The forcible removal of her from stage was so absurd, reports the Netherlands newspaper NRC Handelsblad, that audience members initially applauded thinking it was a statement about censorship.

From Flanders News:

The organisers of Monday's TEDxBrussels event are refusing to comment on what happened.

TED is a prestigious series of talks in which speakers get a maximum of 18 minutes to spread innovative ideas and tell how they can contribute to a better world. It started off as a 4-day conference in the US state of California.

From Flanders Today:

According to Focus Knack, TEDxBrussels – run by a group of volunteers – was told by De Robertis that she would not show images from her performances as part of her talk. When she did, they decided to shut it down. The New York-based Sapling Foundation, which owns TEDx, did not agree with the move.

TED (Technology, Entertainment, Design) Conferences started 1984 in California and cover most topics nowadays. The talks are intended to be thought provoking and are short, being 18 minutes or less in duration. Some may consider the talks too fluffy and lacking distinct solutions. The parent organization is a nonprofit, nonpartisan foundation with the agenda to make great ideas accessible and spark conversation. TEDx events are independently run and occur around the world. Until just now they used to also occur in Brussels.

From Flanders Today : TEDx Brussels loses license due to censorship
From Flanders News : TEDxBrussels loses licence after incident with controversial artist
From Mashable : TEDxBrussels organizer drags presenter off stage during anti-censorship talk


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by FatPhil on Wednesday March 14 2018, @12:52PM

    by FatPhil (863) <reversethis-{if.fdsa} {ta} {tnelyos-cp}> on Wednesday March 14 2018, @12:52PM (#652332) Homepage
    > Shouldn't have let her on stage if they were that concerned about the content of her artwork.

    Garbage logic.

    What you've said is the "substituting the field of art for the field of war" equivalent of not letting a military general give a talk because he'd napalm the place?

    What you have done and shown, and bombed, in the past is apsolutely orthogonal to what you will do and show in a talk, *even if the talk is about what you have previously done and shown, and bombed*.

    They thought it was possible to give a talk about art being censorred without the need to show the censorred works.
    *She* thought, or at least pretended, it was possible to give a talk about art being censorred without the need to show the censorred works.
    It's possible, for example to give a talk about DeCSS decryption without having any DVDs on show.
    It's possible to give a talk about torture without showing any thumbscrews.
    Believe it or not, it's possible to give a talk about tha majority of subjects without any visual aids at all!

    Anyway, he agreed to that.
    That's a contract.
    She reneged.

    This should not be thought of as a censorship case against TEDx, this is a breach of contract case against her.

    Aside - I fully support her right to expose blatent hypocrisy at the cost of her own modesty (which perhaps she doesn't value that highly). I totally disagree with the arty-farty-woo-woo she's wrapped her political statements in, she's weakened the argument supporting her action with it, to be honest, but still she has a point. It would have been better if she'd have just kept her legs open, but her mouth shut.
    --
    Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Insightful=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3