SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
A study has found evidence that "treaty brides" were brought from Romania and Bulgaria to Bavaria around 500 C.E. Their elongated skulls could be the result of artificial cranial deformation practiced back home:
In a handful of medieval Bavarian farming hamlets populated mostly by blue-eyed blondes, more than a dozen women with dark hair, dark eyes, and unusual elongated skulls would have stood out. A new DNA study suggests that these women, whose striking skulls have been unearthed from nearby grave sites, were high-ranking "treaty brides" from Romania and Bulgaria, married off to cement political alliances. Yet others are skeptical. "This is one of the strangest things I've ever read," says Israel Hershkovitz, an anthropologist at Tel Aviv University in Israel, who specializes in ancient human anatomy. "I don't buy it."
The remains, which date to about 500 C.E., are part of a pattern of elongated skulls found in gravesites across early and medieval Europe and Asia. The Bavarian skulls were unearthed alongside regularly shaped ones near six modern southern German towns along the Danube River starting in the late 1960s. Few clues exist as to their identities, or how and why the skulls were stretched. Curious about the "tower-shaped" skulls, anthropologist and population geneticist Joachim Burger, from Johannes Gutenberg University in Mainz, Germany, set out to sequence their DNA.
Burger and colleagues compared the DNA from tiny bone fragments in the graves with each other and those of modern populations throughout Europe and Asia. The DNA of 10 men—and 13 women with normal skulls—most closely matched modern populations in central and northern Europe. Most had genes for blond hair and blue eyes. But DNA from the 13 women with elongated skulls told a different tale. The genetics of these women matched modern populations in southeastern Europe, specifically Bulgaria and Romania [open, DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1719880115] [DX], and they had genes for darker hair and eyes, the researchers report today in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
(Score: 2) by JoeMerchant on Friday March 16 2018, @03:04AM (1 child)
Captured and permanently marked.
🌻🌻 [google.com]
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 16 2018, @06:28PM
It seems like tattooing or some other branding would be cheaper and more effective. I mean, they can just put on a hat and look mostly normal probably, but a slave tattoo on the face or hands is a lot harder to hide. OT but interesting - tattoos are looked down upon in many cultures because they have historically been used to mark slaves and criminals. The rise of offender lists is a modern form of this, having to wear your (or, unfortunately far too often, someone else's) crimes for the rest of your life.