SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
YouTube wants to debunk conspiracy theory videos using other resources, such as Wikipedia:
In Austin, Texas, on Tuesday, YouTube CEO Susan Wojcicki told the audience at the South by Southwest Interactive conference that the social video site plans to defuse conspiracy theory content by pairing it with corrective information culled from Wikipedia – a site editable by more or less anyone. However, she neglected to inform Wikipedia, which on Wednesday reacted with bemusement.
In a statement, the crowdsourced encyclopedia's parent, the Wikimedia Foundation, said, "We are always happy to see people, companies and organizations recognize Wikipedia's value as a repository of free knowledge. In this case, neither Wikipedia nor the Wikimedia Foundation are part of a formal partnership with YouTube. We were not given advance notice of this announcement." The foundation urged companies that use Wikipedia's content – that would be YouTube – "to give back in the spirit of sustainability."
Wikipedia contributor Phoebe Ayers framed the issue more bluntly, commenting via Twitter, "It's not polite to treat Wikipedia like an endlessly renewable resource with infinite free labor."
(Score: 4, Informative) by takyon on Thursday March 15 2018, @11:52PM (3 children)
Wikipedia's statement didn't say "Fuck you! How dare you!?". It just said that there was no formal partnership involved, which may have been implied by YouTube's CEO, and that it would be nice if companies that used Wikipedia content give something in return.
The Wikipedian quoted said that it was "not polite" to treat Wikipedia like an endlessly renewable resource with infinite free labor. That's not stopping anybody from doing so.
[SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
(Score: 3, Interesting) by Justin Case on Friday March 16 2018, @12:10AM (1 child)
Sorry, I wasn't clear. I wasn't commenting about Wikipedia's gentle request for support. I thought it odd that The Register acts like a near-crime has been committed here, when they could well be guilty of the same offense: using the HREF tag as designed.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 16 2018, @01:56AM
From what I understand, it's not the linking that's the problem, but the inclusion of scrapped snippets from Wikipedia. The issue is in making it available, but not editable. Wikipedia depends on "free labor", and every visitor is a potential editor; if you scrap content and post it elsewhere (especially a site as large as YouTube), you reduce the pool of potential editors, and that has a direct negative impact on Wikipedia.
(Score: 2) by darkfeline on Saturday March 17 2018, @03:29AM
I'm pretty sure Google donates quite a bit to Wikimedia [citation needed], and that Wikimedia has a ton of cash reserves and doesn't actually need more donations [citation needed], so this sounds like a cheap guilt trip to try to get even more donations for unknown reasons.
Join the SDF Public Access UNIX System today!