Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by mrpg on Friday March 16 2018, @12:35AM   Printer-friendly
from the ∫-√(1+[f(x)']²)dx dept.

Suppose, a litre of cola costs US$3.15. If you buy one third of a litre of cola, how much would you pay?

The above may seem like a rather basic question. Something that you would perhaps expect the vast majority of adults to be able to answer? Particularly if they are allowed to use a calculator.

Unfortunately, the reality is that a large number of adults across the world struggle with even such basic financial tasks (the correct answer is US$1.05, by the way).

[...] In many other countries, the situation is even worse. Four in every ten adults in places like England, Canada, Spain and the US can't make this straightforward calculation – even when they had a calculator to hand. Similarly, less than half of adults in places like Chile, Turkey and South Korea can get the right answer.

-- submitted from IRC

High number of adults unable to do basic mathematical tasks


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 5, Interesting) by Fluffeh on Friday March 16 2018, @02:42AM (1 child)

    by Fluffeh (954) Subscriber Badge on Friday March 16 2018, @02:42AM (#653303) Journal

    you could even get a lot of college grads with questions like that

    I used to work in an area with a lot of forecasters looking after a supply chain. When interviewing applicants for new roles, we would always have a conversation like this:

    "You have an item with a base forecast of 100. What do you get it you apply a 50% uplift to it?"
    "150"
    "Okay, of course, now apply a 50% reduction back to it. What's the forecast?"

    It's truly scary how many people answer with 100 again. And this is for a job where math is supposed to be second nature.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +3  
       Interesting=3, Total=3
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   5  
  • (Score: 4, Informative) by TheRaven on Friday March 16 2018, @09:08AM

    by TheRaven (270) on Friday March 16 2018, @09:08AM (#653461) Journal
    That's the problem with running computations in a neural network. I bet if you asked them to apply a 50% reduction to a forecast of 150, they'd be able to give the right answer if you didn't prime them by associating the 50% with 100 and 150.
    --
    sudo mod me up