Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by mrpg on Friday March 16 2018, @12:35AM   Printer-friendly
from the ∫-√(1+[f(x)']²)dx dept.

Suppose, a litre of cola costs US$3.15. If you buy one third of a litre of cola, how much would you pay?

The above may seem like a rather basic question. Something that you would perhaps expect the vast majority of adults to be able to answer? Particularly if they are allowed to use a calculator.

Unfortunately, the reality is that a large number of adults across the world struggle with even such basic financial tasks (the correct answer is US$1.05, by the way).

[...] In many other countries, the situation is even worse. Four in every ten adults in places like England, Canada, Spain and the US can't make this straightforward calculation – even when they had a calculator to hand. Similarly, less than half of adults in places like Chile, Turkey and South Korea can get the right answer.

-- submitted from IRC

High number of adults unable to do basic mathematical tasks


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Informative) by canopic jug on Friday March 16 2018, @10:33AM (3 children)

    by canopic jug (3949) Subscriber Badge on Friday March 16 2018, @10:33AM (#653495) Journal

    It was Saint [newrepublic.com]Reagan [vanityfair.com] that did in general use of metrics in the US. Eventually the few companies still doing manufacturing inside the US had to switch anyway [us-metric.org] for cost reasons. So the situation is more of a hyrbid model with a few areas, such as road signs, where the old system remains in use for a while longer. I can see a lot of reasons why the US might go fully metric in the coming decades.

    --
    Money is not free speech. Elections should not be auctions.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Informative=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 1) by Ethanol-fueled on Saturday March 17 2018, @12:08AM (2 children)

    by Ethanol-fueled (2792) on Saturday March 17 2018, @12:08AM (#653860) Homepage

    There's nothing worse than having to use both standard and metric in the same gadget-factory. Even worse than that is having a product line with different sizes and having one standard and the others metric. Even worse than that is using both standard and metric on each of a type of product. Don't laugh, the latter exists, albeit rarely.

    • (Score: 1) by canopic jug on Saturday March 17 2018, @06:25AM

      by canopic jug (3949) Subscriber Badge on Saturday March 17 2018, @06:25AM (#653979) Journal

      That might explain the combination of metric and standard nuts I found on a car's starter motor when replacing it a long time ago.

      --
      Money is not free speech. Elections should not be auctions.
    • (Score: 1, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday March 17 2018, @11:15AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Saturday March 17 2018, @11:15AM (#654020)

      There's nothing worse than having to use both standard and metric in the same gadget-factory.

      How about getting dimensionless drawings in?
      Normally worked in mm (UK here), used to get customer drawings in with just numbers on them, then it's a game of contacting them to find out they're in cm, inches, feet...even had one where the customer said the length was 2 yards, and the width 4 cm....just as well I'm already bald.