SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
Signs of symbolic behavior emerged at the dawn of our species in Africa
More than 320,000 years ago in the Rift Valley of Africa, some early innovators adopted a new technology: They eschewed the clunky, palm-size stone hand axes that their ancestors had used for more than a million years in favor of a sleek new toolkit. Like new generations of cellphones today, their Middle Stone Age (MSA) blades and points were smaller and more precise than the old so-called Acheulean hand axes and scrapers.
These toolmakers in the Olorgesailie Basin in Kenya chose as raw materials shiny black obsidian and white and green chert, rocks they had to get from distant sources or through trade networks. In another first, they chiseled red and black rocks, probably to use as crayons to color their bodies or spears—an early sign of symbolic behavior. "This is indicative of a gear change in behavior, toolmaking, and material culture," says evolutionary psychologist Robin Dunbar at the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom, who studies social networks.
A trio of papers released online in Science today documents this remarkable technological transition. Although other sites have yielded MSA tools, the new, securely dated chronology nudges the transition back by at least 20,000 years, matching when our species, Homo sapiens, is now thought to have emerged. By analyzing artifacts over time at one site, the papers also show that these behaviors developed as climate swings intensified, supporting the idea that environmental variability drove innovation.
Related:
Environmental dynamics during the onset of the Middle Stone Age in eastern Africa (DOI: 10.1126/science.aao2200) (DX)
Chronology of the Acheulean to Middle Stone Age transition in eastern Africa (DOI: 10.1126/science.aao2216) (DX)
Long-distance stone transport and pigment use in the earliest Middle Stone Age (DOI: 10.1126/science.aao2646) (DX)
(Score: 2) by JNCF on Friday March 16 2018, @06:08PM (1 child)
If it spread along the coasts, not necessarily. I do think that this requirement all but rules out civs past a certain tech and population threshold -- if they covered all the coastal land they would eventually move inwards.
We're talking about a small gold trinket left unprotected on a shoreline for over ten thousand years. You think it would necessarily still be recoverable in the modern day? I can imagine the hypothetical artifact getting swept into the ocean and banged against rocks until it became unrecognisable.
(Score: 1) by khallow on Friday March 16 2018, @08:38PM
I disagree. You would have widespread common artifacts, genetic heritage, language, etc which we would see today. Let us keep in mind that the traditional model already takes into account a lot of prehistoric migration, so it's not like the establishment completely discounts the idea.