Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Friday March 16 2018, @02:44PM   Printer-friendly
from the Moog-want-spear...-Gork-want-axe? dept.

Signs of symbolic behavior emerged at the dawn of our species in Africa

More than 320,000 years ago in the Rift Valley of Africa, some early innovators adopted a new technology: They eschewed the clunky, palm-size stone hand axes that their ancestors had used for more than a million years in favor of a sleek new toolkit. Like new generations of cellphones today, their Middle Stone Age (MSA) blades and points were smaller and more precise than the old so-called Acheulean hand axes and scrapers.

These toolmakers in the Olorgesailie Basin in Kenya chose as raw materials shiny black obsidian and white and green chert, rocks they had to get from distant sources or through trade networks. In another first, they chiseled red and black rocks, probably to use as crayons to color their bodies or spears—an early sign of symbolic behavior. "This is indicative of a gear change in behavior, toolmaking, and material culture," says evolutionary psychologist Robin Dunbar at the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom, who studies social networks.

A trio of papers released online in Science today documents this remarkable technological transition. Although other sites have yielded MSA tools, the new, securely dated chronology nudges the transition back by at least 20,000 years, matching when our species, Homo sapiens, is now thought to have emerged. By analyzing artifacts over time at one site, the papers also show that these behaviors developed as climate swings intensified, supporting the idea that environmental variability drove innovation.

Related:

Environmental dynamics during the onset of the Middle Stone Age in eastern Africa (DOI: 10.1126/science.aao2200) (DX)

Chronology of the Acheulean to Middle Stone Age transition in eastern Africa (DOI: 10.1126/science.aao2216) (DX)

Long-distance stone transport and pigment use in the earliest Middle Stone Age (DOI: 10.1126/science.aao2646) (DX)


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1) by khallow on Friday March 16 2018, @08:31PM (1 child)

    by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Friday March 16 2018, @08:31PM (#653781) Journal
    The climate of the region seemed to have encouraged it. Occupation was seasonal. Perhaps they migrated out during good foraging months and then stayed over in this area during the tougher part of the year. At that point, you would have had a high density of tribes in the area and a need to organize.
  • (Score: 2) by Arik on Friday March 16 2018, @09:00PM

    by Arik (4543) on Friday March 16 2018, @09:00PM (#653798) Journal
    I'm trying to remember exactly who it was, I think it's from one of those history channel docus or something so maybe just nonsense, but I am remembering hearing that there was some evidence for a year-round custodial staff at the site. If that were true, it might have been the very first professional priesthood, and the first sedentary humans. It's possible that a clan settled down at the site, built it up over time, and that it functioned to unite a federation as if they were a single tribe. The Jebusites are said to have come from the same area originally, at least approximately.
    --
    If laughter is the best medicine, who are the best doctors?