Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Saturday March 17 2018, @01:56AM   Printer-friendly
from the Count-Craters?-There's-no-Duke-or-Earl? dept.

Using AI to count craters on the moon at U of T's Centre for Planetary Sciences

A new technique developed by researchers at the University of Toronto is using the technology behind self-driving cars to measure the size and location of crater impacts on the moon.

"When it comes to counting craters on the moon, it's a pretty archaic method," says Mohamad Ali-Dib, a postdoctoral researcher at the Centre for Planetary Sciences (CPS) at U of T Scarborough.

"Basically we need to manually look at an image, locate and count the craters and then calculate how large they are based off the size of the image. Here we've developed a technique from artificial intelligence that can automate this entire process that saves significant time and effort."

[...] In order to determine its accuracy, the researchers first trained the neural network on a large data set covering two-thirds of the moon, and then tested their trained network on the remaining third of the moon. It worked so well that it was able to identify twice as many craters as traditional manual counting. In fact, it was able to identify about 6,000 previously unidentified craters on the moon.

Also at New Scientist and Science News.

Lunar Crater Identification via Deep Learning (arXiv:1803.02192)


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by maxwell demon on Saturday March 17 2018, @08:57AM (3 children)

    by maxwell demon (1608) on Saturday March 17 2018, @08:57AM (#654001) Journal

    If they just had counted the craters by hand, you probably would never have heard about it.

    For the data itself, it probably would have sufficient to extrapolate the last third. I don't think a crater more or less makes a big difference in whatever they are going to use that data for.

    --
    The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday March 17 2018, @09:47AM (2 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday March 17 2018, @09:47AM (#654010)

    "There are 4000 holes in the road in Blackburn Lancashire, one twenty-sixth of a hole per person, according to a council survey. If Blackburn is typical then there are over two million holes in Britain's roads and 300 000 in London." (attributed to the 17 January 1967 Daily Mail)

    • (Score: 2) by maxwell demon on Saturday March 17 2018, @10:10AM (1 child)

      by maxwell demon (1608) on Saturday March 17 2018, @10:10AM (#654014) Journal

      You know the difference between 2/3 and 1/500? Moreover I'm sure the scientists know how to select an unbiased sample, which the Daily Mail sample obviously was not.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday March 17 2018, @10:24PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Saturday March 17 2018, @10:24PM (#654239)

        Whoosh!