New Report Reveals Google's Extensive Financial Support for European Academics and Think Tanks
Today, Campaign for Accountability (CfA), a nonpartisan, nonprofit watchdog group focused on public accountability, released a new report revealing how Google has paid tens of millions of euros to European academic institutions over the past decade to develop an influential network of friendly European academics who write research papers supporting the tech giant's business interests.
CfA Executive Director Daniel E. Stevens stated, "Google's lavish funding of academics and think tanks helps the company exert a subtle and hidden form of influence on European policymakers. As Europe looks to crack down on Google's excesses, regulators need to be aware that a good deal of the academic research defending the company is written by Google-funded institutions."
Spanning the length and breadth of Europe, Google-funded think thanks have published hundreds of papers on issues central to the company's business, from antitrust enforcement to regulation governing privacy, copyright, jobs, and the "right to be forgotten." Events organized by Google-funded institutions have attracted many of the European policymakers charged with creating and enforcing regulation affecting the company.
One of the donors to the Campaign for Accountability is Oracle.
Also at Politico.
(Score: 5, Interesting) by bobthecimmerian on Saturday March 17 2018, @12:45PM
I don't think you're talking about the same problem that the article describes. You're talking about Apple, Microsoft, and Google providing their respective products to schools at very low cost to get children accustomed to using their products. I agree it happens everywhere, and while I understand why it makes sense for the companies to do it, I think it's very bad for society as a whole. From the perspective of Apple, Microsoft, and Google it's pure genius - 95% of the population finishes school with complete comfort with iPads, Windows, Microsoft Office, and Chromebooks so the odds of getting people to take a serious look at any alternative are dramatically reduced.
But that's not what this article is describing. As far as I can tell, it's describing giving research grants and funding the construction and staffing of departments. Even if there's no explicit agreement, "I give you this money, and you write nice things about what our company does and don't write anything negative about our company", that's clearly what Google intended. This move makes sense for Google, just like providing equipment and services to schools at low cost makes sense for Google. But it means policy decisions and public opinion of Google are unfairly influenced.