Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 17 submissions in the queue.
posted by martyb on Saturday March 17 2018, @08:25AM   Printer-friendly
from the if-you-have-nothing-to-hide dept.

In a story that should interest anyone involved in on-line security the Canadian Press reports that:

The chief executive of a Vancouver-based company appeared in a Washington state court on Thursday in the first U.S. case in which a company has been targeted for providing criminal drug cartels with the technology to evade law enforcement, the U.S. Justice Department said.

Phantom Secure CEO Vincent Ramos was indicted, along with four of his associates, on charges related to providing criminal organizations with cellular phones and encrypted networks to coordinate the shipment of illegal drugs around the world.

"Phantom Secure allegedly provided a service designed to allow criminals the world over to evade law enforcement to traffic drugs and commit acts of violent crime without detection," said FBI Director Christopher Wray in a statement.

CNBC suggests that Phantom Secure was selling "hacked" BlackBerry and Samsung phones:

The people behind a company that hacked Samsung and BlackBerry phones to make them more secure, have been indicted for allegedly conspiring with drug cartels to help them evade law enforcement and sell narcotics.

Phantom Secure, a Canada-based firm, sold Samsung and BlackBerry devices that had been modified with a higher encryption. This made it difficult for the authorities to trace drug traffickers.

Phantom Secure's web site does say that:

We are a law-abiding company that is permitted to deliver encrypted communication services to our clients in order for them to protect their communications, without having the ability to decrypt their communications. Our service does not require personal information and has no back doors.

In providing such a service we do understand that there will be a very small number of people that may use our service to do activities we do not support. We do not condone the use of our service for any type of illegal activities and if known we will terminate the use of our service without notice. Considering this, requests for the contents of communications may arise from government agencies, which would require a valid search warrant from an agency with proper jurisdiction over Phantom Secure. However, our response to such requests will be the content and identity of our clients are not stored on our server and that the content is encrypted data, which is indecipherable.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by TheReaperD on Saturday March 17 2018, @11:52AM (2 children)

    by TheReaperD (5556) on Saturday March 17 2018, @11:52AM (#654027)

    Sadly, as the American Civil Liberties Union and the Free Software Foundation have long since discovered, you have to fight the cases for people's rights and freedoms with the cases you get handed, not the cases you want. Sometimes you have to defend the child rapist or drug smuggler if the government is overstepping its bounds and hoping it'll get a pass because you hate what the person has done enough to overlook any government transgressions, planning only to then use that new leeway on everyone else (because courts run on president). Now, whether or not this is one of those cases, I don't know, it requires a lot more information than we have here to make that judgement.

    --
    Ad eundum quo nemo ante iit
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Insightful=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 4, Informative) by stormwyrm on Saturday March 17 2018, @12:23PM

    by stormwyrm (717) on Saturday March 17 2018, @12:23PM (#654032) Journal
    True, but then again, from what information we have, a bad law or some strange evidence isn't being used against Phantom Secure, which would make it a good case for the ACLU or EFF to get behind. It looks rather more like the police did old-fashioned investigative work on them and found that the company selling secured mobile phones seemed to also be dipping into outright drug trafficking.
    --
    Numquam ponenda est pluralitas sine necessitate.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday March 17 2018, @12:53PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday March 17 2018, @12:53PM (#654041)

    Auto-correct alert!

    > (because courts run on president)

    What a terrible, terrible situation that would be.

    Fortunately, the courts and the president are different branches of government and the courts actually run on *precedent* :)