Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 18 submissions in the queue.
posted by cmn32480 on Saturday March 17 2018, @04:32PM   Printer-friendly
from the thanks-a-lot-you-nimnobs dept.

An appeals court threw out part of a Federal Communications Commission regulation aimed at reducing automated telephone solicitations, weakening a 2015 effort to squelch the scourge of so-called robocalls.

The rule was aimed at calls generated by auto-dialing devices. But its language was too broad, and could be construed to prohibit calls from any smartphone, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruled in a unanimous opinion Friday.

[...] Unwanted calls, including robocalls, are the top consumer complaint to the FCC, with more than 200,000 such comments received annually, according to the agency. Some private analyses estimate that U.S. consumers received about 2.4 billion robocalls per month in 2016.

[...] Because under the FCC's rule "any uninvited call or message from the device is a statutory violation," regular smartphone users could face a $500 penalty for calls -- such as inviting a person to a party -- without first getting consent to contact them, the judges said.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-03-16/u-s-robocall-limits-partly-tossed-out-by-federal-appeals-court

-- submitted from IRC


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday March 17 2018, @10:39PM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday March 17 2018, @10:39PM (#654250)

    All they need to do is to hold telecoms accountable for what spoofed numbers do if they can't identify the caller. And if phone users were offered the option to only have the phone ring for calls in their phone book.

    Those two measures alone would more or less kill the industry that makes money through unauthorized calls. Personally, it's beyond me why Google doesn't allow Android users to silence any calls from people not in my phonebook, it's not exactly rocket surgery.

  • (Score: 3, Informative) by DavePolaschek on Monday March 19 2018, @01:39PM

    by DavePolaschek (6129) on Monday March 19 2018, @01:39PM (#654879) Homepage Journal

    And if phone users were offered the option to only have the phone ring for calls in their phone book.

    Set your default ringtone to silent. For everyone in your phone book, set the ringtone to [something not silent].

    There, I fixed it for you.

    Oh, you'll probably have to set your own number to a silent ringtone, though. 90% of the spam calls I get are from (MYNPA) MYNXX-ABCD and close to half are coming from my own phone if caller-ID is to be believed.