Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 15 submissions in the queue.
posted by janrinok on Monday March 19 2018, @01:14AM   Printer-friendly
from the darwinism-ftw dept.

People's willingness to use a Zika vaccine when it's available will be influenced by how they weigh the risks associated with the disease and the vaccine, but also by their misconceptions about other vaccines, a new study has found.

While a Zika vaccine is in development, the study by researchers at the Annenberg Public Policy Center (APPC) of the University of Pennsylvania examined factors that will affect the eventual acceptance or rejection of such a vaccine.

The study, published in the Journal of Public Health, found that people's erroneous beliefs about an association between the measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine and autism were a predictor of people's lessened intention to get a Zika vaccine. The study also found that people's perceptions of the severity of the Zika virus as well as their general belief in the power of science to solve problems increased their intention to get the vaccine.

"When a new disease arises, people who lack understanding of the new threat may extrapolate from their knowledge of other diseases," said Yotam Ophir, a Ph.D. candidate at Penn's Annenberg School for Communication who co-authored the study with APPC Director Kathleen Hall Jamieson. "We found that the misbelief about the MMR vaccine's association with autism was more influential on the decision of whether to get vaccinated for Zika than even perceptions of Zika itself, which is worrisome, especially in light of the persistence of that misinformation."

[...] The bogus association between the MMR vaccine and autism has been disproven in numerous studies. However, the argument is still prominent among people who oppose vaccinations. "Scientists often look at the effect of misinformed beliefs about the MMR vaccine on people's intention to vaccinate children with the triple vaccine, but they don't as often look at the dangerous spillover effects that these misbeliefs can have," said Ophir, who will be joining APPC as a postdoctoral fellow.

He said that prior research has shown that it is very hard to completely debunk misinformation, such as the mistaken belief that the MMR vaccine causes autism, but the study results suggest that accurately communicating about the risks of Zika can help lessen the detrimental effects of the misbelief. "Even if we can't change what people think about the MMR vaccine, if we can give them an accurate picture of how vulnerable they are to a disease such as Zika, they can make a more informed decision about it," Ophir said.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by NotSanguine on Monday March 19 2018, @06:22AM

    Point me to the data you want. Specifics, see my last point "I will be more than happy to provide the sources for any of these, but please make your request coherent and specific. I will not track down "every single study on amphetamine's bioequivalence.""

    You provide a reference to a paywalled paper [sciencedirect.com] (which, given the state of scientific publishing isn't surprising), and the abstract is vague in the extreme. As such, I can't make much of what's there. Especially since other paywalled papers [sciencedirect.com] directly contradict the conclusions of the one you referenced.

    Sadly, I have no access to either paper or the data upon which they were based. Do you? Care to share?

    You also provide a link (https://www.fda.gov/downloads/AboutFDA/CentersOffices/OfficeofGlobalRegulatoryOperationsandPolicy/ORA/ORAElectronicReadingRoom/UCM552668.pdf) to site reports concerning a single manufacturer's operational issues. Where are all the others you've cited? I think the number was 55? And there's no reference to any actions that the FDA may or may not have taken in response to those (or any other issues). Shall I just take your word for it that no fines or other sanctions were levied?

    I'd also point out that we're discussing the MMR vaccine, not amphetamines here, although there seemed to be compounds other than amphetamines (at least in my cursory scan through the poorly copied PDF) that were primarily at issue.

    I'm sure you believe what you're going on about. And good for you! All the same, you haven't provided any factual support for your claims. Just disputed claims and a single, marginally relevant report which doesn't provide factual evidence of your claims.

    Whatever. Carry on.

    --
    No, no, you're not thinking; you're just being logical. --Niels Bohr
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2