Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Monday March 19 2018, @11:15AM   Printer-friendly
from the nuke-it-from-orbit dept.

There's no need to freak out yet, however. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), NASA and the National Nuclear Security Administration are on the case, and they're thinking about wielding a big Hammer.

Hammer stands for "Hypervelocity Asteroid Mitigation Mission for Emergency Response," which is an impressive name all on its own. Hammer's a concept at the moment, but if built, it would be a 30-foot-tall (9 meter), 8.8-ton spacecraft that could act as either an asteroid battering ram or as a delivery vehicle for a nuclear device. Let's call it the "nudge or nuke" option.  

Bennu is a beast, according to the national lab. It's 1,664 times as heavy as the Titanic and measures more than five football fields in diameter. If it hit Earth, the impact would unleash 80,000 times the energy of the atomic bomb used on Hiroshima in 1945. It would be devastating.

Hammer is designed to launch using NASA's Delta IV Heavy rocket. Researchers at Lawrence Livermore published a paper in the journal Acta Astronautica in February that evaluates the options for using the spacecraft to successfully encourage Bennu to redirect from Earth.

The researchers say ramming the asteroid to change its course would be ideal, but it would need to be a "gentle nudge" that doesn't cause it to break up. It's a complicated proposition. 

The team looked at a variety of scenarios. For example, if Earth started launching Hammer missions just 10 years before impact, "it was determined that it could take between 34 and 53 launches of the Delta IV Heavy rocket, each carrying a single Hammer impactor, to make a Bennu-class asteroid miss the Earth," the lab reported on Thursday.

All of this makes it sound like a gentle nudge might not be the best solution for big asteroids. 


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by HiThere on Monday March 19 2018, @05:26PM

    by HiThere (866) Subscriber Badge on Monday March 19 2018, @05:26PM (#655014) Journal

    You are assuming the asteroid has lots of internal strength. Many of them are more "rubble piles", and would just break apart under any significant thrust...or swallow the thruster, either turning it in the process or even letting it push its way through. Imagine you're trying to push around a gigaton of crushed ice, that's so cold it barely melted and refroze at all.

    Now some of them are chunks of rock or metal, but you can't count on it. OTOH, my description is really more appropriate for asteroids that live out beyond the orbit of Mars. But it may well have started out that, and when it moved in closer it would evaporate into a dustpile. Admittedly you might get some vacuum crementation, but not enough to give much structural strength.

    --
    Javascript is what you use to allow unknown third parties to run software you have no idea about on your computer.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2