The Guardian has an article about a whistleblower from Cambridge Analytica, who claims to have devised a strategy to "weaponize" Facebook profiles, in order to use those profile for targeted advertising to sway the US elections in 2016.
(The Guardian headline titles are often crap). I read a few older articles, presumably by the same author: she had a series of articles in March--May 2017 about Cambridge Analytica being used as a weapon to convince British voters to vote for Brexit in the referendum. It seems that her investigative journalism encouraged this wistleblower to "come out" and be interviewed by her.
Here's one: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/may/07/the-great-british-brexit-robbery-hijacked-democracy
Democracy is the worst form of government, except for all the others (Churchill), but when does advertising cross the line into psychological warfare against your own population?
Additional coverage at The Register
(Score: 5, Interesting) by GreatAuntAnesthesia on Monday March 19 2018, @01:33PM (1 child)
Also worth noting - in both the Brexit and US elections, this Cambrige Analytica service seems to have breached regulations regarding soliciting campaign contributions & assistance from foreign individuals.
(Score: 5, Informative) by c0lo on Monday March 19 2018, @02:17PM
That's the continuation of a very good tradition that saw Boris Yeltsin re-elected back in 1996 [wikipedia.org].
US even hired consultants for the campaign [theguardian.com]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford