Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Monday March 19 2018, @12:52PM   Printer-friendly
from the psychological-warfare-in-peacetime dept.

The Guardian has an article about a whistleblower from Cambridge Analytica, who claims to have devised a strategy to "weaponize" Facebook profiles, in order to use those profile for targeted advertising to sway the US elections in 2016.

The Cambridge Analytica Files: ‘I created Steve Bannon’s psychological warfare tool’: meet the data war whistleblower

(The Guardian headline titles are often crap). I read a few older articles, presumably by the same author: she had a series of articles in March--May 2017 about Cambridge Analytica being used as a weapon to convince British voters to vote for Brexit in the referendum. It seems that her investigative journalism encouraged this wistleblower to "come out" and be interviewed by her.

Here's one: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/may/07/the-great-british-brexit-robbery-hijacked-democracy

Democracy is the worst form of government, except for all the others (Churchill), but when does advertising cross the line into psychological warfare against your own population?

Additional coverage at The Register


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2, Interesting) by khallow on Monday March 19 2018, @05:47PM (2 children)

    by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Monday March 19 2018, @05:47PM (#655027) Journal

    Just because the war hasn't turned hot in your corner of the planet doesn't mean the war has no casualties.

    More, it's not just one war. There are multiple wars, and multiple fronts. Half of those fronts may be chill right now, but people are dying on the other fronts.

    In other words, it's a few dozen small wars and Syria. Vastly better than the days leading up to the Second World War. I don't buy that there is a global war between cultures merely because there are wars between cultures. You're making the fallacy of composition where you are extrapolating from a part of the world to the whole. Just because there are wars doesn't mean there is a global war.

    Each and every terror attack that makes the headlines in Europe is, in actuality, just one more skirmish in just one of those fronts, in one of those wars.

    So what? It's not much of a skirmish.

    There's no well-defined enemies, little fighting that wouldn't happen anyway (and certainly far less than one would expect from a global war), and no strategy for winning this alleged war. Getting ourselves entangled in foreign wars without a clear idea of why we're there or hope to achieve is a recipe for disaster.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Interesting=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Monday March 19 2018, @06:41PM (1 child)

    by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Monday March 19 2018, @06:41PM (#655056) Journal

    Getting ourselves entangled in foreign wars without a clear idea of why we're there or hope to achieve is a recipe for disaster.

    I'll agree with you on that point. But, the Ottoman was toppled for a reason. And, the Muslims are fighting back for equally valid reasons. Among their valid reasons, they fear that they might go the way of the Assyrians. And - they might, at that. Their culture is under assault, daily, via the internet, television, radio, and more.

    I was shown a photo some years ago. In Saudi Arabia, it is (or was) illegal to watch foreign television. Yet, nearly every apartment within sight of the camera lens had a satellite dish. Their culture, not to mention the authority of their religious authorities, has been under constand assault by the west. And, we wonder why the most fanatic Muslim extremists come from Saudi Arabia . . .

    No, we aren't exactly waging a World War, like the 1940's. But there is a war, and there are casualties. Again, I tell you, just because your little piece of the world seems peaceful, doesn't mean the world is peaceful.

    • (Score: 2) by NotSanguine on Monday March 19 2018, @11:56PM

      No, we aren't exactly waging a World War, like the 1940's. But there is a war, and there are casualties. Again, I tell you, just because your little piece of the world seems peaceful, doesn't mean the world is peaceful.

      Actually, we are (and have been for quite some time), by pretty much every measure, living in the most peaceful, prosperous and free (by certain definitions of that word) time in the history of human civilization.

      I'm all for making things *more* peaceful, *more* prosperous and *more* free.

      But claiming that everything is going to hell, when the truth is the opposite, seems pretty silly Runaway.

      --
      No, no, you're not thinking; you're just being logical. --Niels Bohr