Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Tuesday March 20 2018, @08:24PM   Printer-friendly
from the face-up-to-it dept.

The new report, which was released Thursday, comes on the heels of a related 2016 report showing that half of Americans’ faces are already in a facial recognition database.

“As currently envisioned, the program represents a serious escalation of biometric scanning of Americans, and there are no codified rules that constrain it,” the report concludes.

In July 2017, Ars reported that facial-scanning pilot programs are already underway in international departure airports at six American airports—Boston, Chicago, Houston, Atlanta, New York City, and Washington, DC. More are set to expand next year. In a recent privacy assessment issued one month earlier, DHS noted that the “only way for an individual to ensure he or she is not subject to collection of biometric information when traveling internationally is to refrain from traveling.”

“We’re wondering if this is the best use of a billion dollars?” [Laura Moy, a Georgetown law professor and one of the report's authors] said. “We’ve done the research and we think the answer to that question is ‘no.’”

“When American citizens travel by air, they should not have to choose between privacy and security,” he said. “The implementation of DHS facial scanning program for US citizens leaving the country raises a number of questions.”


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday March 20 2018, @10:26PM (14 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday March 20 2018, @10:26PM (#655673)

    I was recently on jury duty and everyone who reported had a picture taken.

    Well that's certainly one way to thin the jury pool. My privacy is more important to me that your (gub'mint's) desire to force me through a jury selection and potentially jury duty.

    Since the government is well on the way down the road the Stasi took, though, you can bet that they would take the opportunity to incarcerate anyone who refused to accede to having the picture taken and take the opportunity to record photos, fingerprints and more.

  • (Score: 4, Interesting) by edIII on Tuesday March 20 2018, @11:14PM (13 children)

    by edIII (791) on Tuesday March 20 2018, @11:14PM (#655702)

    Privacy is one thing, dignity is another.

    I won't take off my belt. When demanded to, I remind them that belts were invented to keep your pants up. So, I'm supposed to take off the technology needed to keep my pants up, raise up my hands inside the metal detector, and then shuffle through to get my belt again? That's why I fly with absolute comfort, and stretchy sweatpants. Elastic FTW. So when the TSA agents are patting me down and feeling my nuts up, I don't need to worry about holding my pants up.

    The courts? Apparently appearances matter more than justice. You are not allowed to wear shorts or sweats, and the judge will remind you of it quite harshly.

    I haven't been in jury duty forever simply because I cannot enter the courtroom. I've written the judge on two incidents, noting the officers name and badge number that refused me entry, and the city has never come to get me or anything. I just tell the judge the truth, that I don't believe it is Constitutional to require somebody (not convicted or punished of a crime) , to have their dignity stripped in such a manner. If the Judge demands that I visit the court, I will do so in shorts with an elastic waistband.

    --
    Technically, lunchtime is at any moment. It's just a wave function.
    • (Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday March 20 2018, @11:56PM (4 children)

      by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday March 20 2018, @11:56PM (#655724)

      You are concerned for your dignity so you wear sweat pants in public?

      • (Score: 3, Funny) by Runaway1956 on Wednesday March 21 2018, @02:20AM (3 children)

        by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday March 21 2018, @02:20AM (#655820) Journal

        A person with true dignity can stand naked in a crowd and not lose his dignity. EdIII doesn't tell us how he normally dresses. He has stated that he will wear a specific outfit into court, for the purpose of making a statement. Wearing a costume as a form of protest does seem somewhat dignified, actually.

        (At this point, half the readers of this site are thinking "Well, yes, I can stand naked in a crowd, and maintain my dignity!". To which I say, "Demonstrate, please.")

        • (Score: 2) by edIII on Wednesday March 21 2018, @03:36AM

          by edIII (791) on Wednesday March 21 2018, @03:36AM (#655863)

          This person with true dignity can also be subject to the law, which makes him a filthy sex offender.

          I didn't decide to wear clothes. Society forced me :)

          --
          Technically, lunchtime is at any moment. It's just a wave function.
        • (Score: 2, Touché) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday March 21 2018, @06:48AM (1 child)

          by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday March 21 2018, @06:48AM (#655948)

          And you wonder why Azuma teases you about latent homosexual fantasies......

          • (Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Wednesday March 21 2018, @01:34PM

            by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday March 21 2018, @01:34PM (#656085) Journal

            So, uhhhhh - lemme get this straight. Any person who has ever been naked in the company of multiple people, or either gender, or even both genders, is a homosexual? And, what's more, if you were in a public place, and someone snatched your clothes off of you, you would become homosexual? Or - say maybe you and your special other were skinny-dipping, and a crowd of rowdy young men came to watch, both you AND your special other would become homosexuals?

            By those standards, I was a homo from day one. I came into this world naked, because I was too damned poor to buy a diaper on the way in. I arrived with several nurses, a doctor, and even my MOTHER present! GAY!!!

    • (Score: 2) by archfeld on Wednesday March 21 2018, @02:38AM (2 children)

      by archfeld (4650) <treboreel@live.com> on Wednesday March 21 2018, @02:38AM (#655832) Journal

      As long as you can get away with it more power to you. Here in Arizona a grand jury summons comes registered mail, so attendance isn't an optional thing. Someone has to sign that it was delivered or the mail carrier signs that you refused to accept. Technically speaking then the state marshals would come get you but I don't know if that it actually happens or not. I've received summons to regular jury duty both in California and Arizona, both off which I just trashed and ignored as they were not registered and I would just claim that I never saw. I was also a witness to an attempted armed robbery many years ago and that was not optional either. As long as I am not working I don't see it as too great a civic duty, and really don't have a great issue with taking off my belt. Giving up my carry weapon is far more invasive when I enter into the courthouse. I worked a contract at Arizona Western College for a while and they won't allow you on campus armed unless you carry a POST certificate, but I've always kept mine up, you have to certify yearly. The post certificate allows me to carry my weapon concealed when I enter into California, or most other states as well.

      --
      For the NSA : Explosives, guns, assassination, conspiracy, primers, detonators, initiators, main charge, nuclear charge
      • (Score: 2) by edIII on Wednesday March 21 2018, @07:59PM (1 child)

        by edIII (791) on Wednesday March 21 2018, @07:59PM (#656306)

        I think you misunderstood. As for the registered mail, I honestly don't remember if it was or not. As for the jury duty, I'm not seeking to escape it. In fact, I would be happy enough to serve on a jury. When I received the letter, I did make it to court 30 minutes before we were scheduled. I attempted entry, and was DENIED. When I was denied, I got proof that I was there by recording the badge numbers of the officers on duty. Parking fees helped too.

        In my letter to the judge I was brief and to the point. I wasn't going to take my belt of for him, the Pope, Superman, or Jesus. It didn't matter, and the court had no right to strip away my dignity as if I was being processed into jail. The belt was my requirement to wear pants, and I wouldn't risk my pants falling down in public (dignity) because some a-hole officer thinks it funny to demand my hands go up when he sees I'm desperately holding up my pants. I offered to come back to court, as long as the judge wasn't offended by my elastic waistband sweat pants and a t-shirt.

        The key part here is that you don't just ignore it. You become vocal as fuck about it, involve as many people as possible, and you write letters to the judge. In my case, I've gotten away with it twice. Mainly because I suspect that the government really doesn't have the right to force innocent citizens to undress in order to receive and/or participate in justice. Why should we be treated like criminals just because we need to enter a government building?

        As I've gotten older though, I've lost my ability to care. I just show up to court in shorts and t-shirt and let the judge yell at me.

        --
        Technically, lunchtime is at any moment. It's just a wave function.
        • (Score: 2) by archfeld on Thursday March 22 2018, @08:28PM

          by archfeld (4650) <treboreel@live.com> on Thursday March 22 2018, @08:28PM (#656842) Journal

          I did not misunderstand. I to had to remove my belt to go through the metal detector and pat down. I think you are getting overly upset about the belt but that is only my opinion and in that case it was yours that mattered. I am far more upset about my shoes while getting on a plane than anything else but I choose to/have to fly for business otherwise I' never submit to that.

          --
          For the NSA : Explosives, guns, assassination, conspiracy, primers, detonators, initiators, main charge, nuclear charge
    • (Score: 2) by richtopia on Wednesday March 21 2018, @04:12PM (4 children)

      by richtopia (3160) on Wednesday March 21 2018, @04:12PM (#656166) Homepage Journal

      I have a customer who has metal detectors at all entrances to the factory. When I am supporting them, I wear a nylon belt so I do not set off metal detectors.

      https://www.amazon.com/WYuZe-Military-Tactical-Casual-Webbing/dp/B06XRBW22Y/ref=sr_1_1_sspa?ie=UTF8&qid=1521648679&sr=8-1-spons&keywords=nylon+belt&psc=1 [amazon.com]

      • (Score: 2) by edIII on Wednesday March 21 2018, @07:45PM (3 children)

        by edIII (791) on Wednesday March 21 2018, @07:45PM (#656300)

        They will still make you take it off at the airport and let it go through the scanner. Same with any kind of hat or head covering. They just simply refuse to let anything NOT go through the scanners. I'm allowed to opt out of the scanning, but the truth is that only my minimally clothed person with no shoes can get away with not going into the scanner. By minimally clothed, I mean that jackets, sweaters, and any extra layers of clothing must come off.

        The belt is really just one part of it.

        --
        Technically, lunchtime is at any moment. It's just a wave function.
        • (Score: 2) by richtopia on Wednesday March 21 2018, @07:58PM (2 children)

          by richtopia (3160) on Wednesday March 21 2018, @07:58PM (#656305) Homepage Journal

          Where are you flying? I have never been required to remove my belt except if the metal detector goes off.

          • (Score: 2) by edIII on Wednesday March 21 2018, @08:16PM

            by edIII (791) on Wednesday March 21 2018, @08:16PM (#656316)

            The U.S.A, land of the free and home of the brave.

            --
            Technically, lunchtime is at any moment. It's just a wave function.
          • (Score: 2) by archfeld on Thursday March 22 2018, @08:33PM

            by archfeld (4650) <treboreel@live.com> on Thursday March 22 2018, @08:33PM (#656846) Journal

            Oakland international, Phoenix international, San Francisco International, Yuma International. Pretty much any international airport. It has been a while since I have flown through a domestic airport just because of where I live and where I go but I'd like to think that the security flying between domestic ports of call is lesser, but I don't know that...

            --
            For the NSA : Explosives, guns, assassination, conspiracy, primers, detonators, initiators, main charge, nuclear charge