SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
Anonymous coders can be identified using stylometry and machine learning techniques applied to executable binaries:
Source code stylometry – analyzing the syntax of source code for clues about the author – is an established technique used in digital forensics. As the US Army Research Laboratory (ARL) puts it, "Stylometry research has proven that anonymous code contributors can be de-anonymized to reveal the original author, provided the author has published code before."
The technique can help identify virus makers as well as unmask the creators of anti-censorship tools and other outlawed programs. It has the potential to pierce the privacy that many programmers assume they have.
Source code is designed to be human-readable, but binaries – typically produced by compiling or assembling source code – have fewer characteristics that may suggest authorship. Toolchains can be instructed to strip out variable names, function names and other symbols and metadata – which may say something about the author – and alter the structure of code through optimization.
Nonetheless, the researchers – Aylin Caliskan, Fabian Yamaguchi, Edwin Dauber, Richard Harang, Konrad Rieck, Rachel Greenstadt and Arvind Narayanan – building on work described in a 2011 paper, demonstrate that binary files can be analyzed using machine-learning and stylometric techniques.
If you want to remain an anonymous coder, you'd better not contribute anything under your own name publicly:
When Coding Style Survives Compilation: De-anonymizing Programmers from Executable Binaries (arXiv:1512.08546 [cs.CR])
We evaluate our approach on data from the Google Code Jam, obtaining attribution accuracy of up to 96% with 100 and 83% with 600 candidate programmers. We present an executable binary authorship attribution approach, for the first time, that is robust to basic obfuscations, a range of compiler optimization settings, and binaries that have been stripped of their symbol tables. We perform programmer de-anonymization using both obfuscated binaries, and real-world code found "in the wild" in single-author GitHub repositories and the recently leaked Nulled.IO hacker forum. We show that programmers who would like to remain anonymous need to take extreme countermeasures to protect their privacy.
(Score: 2) by fyngyrz on Wednesday March 21 2018, @08:49PM
"Rights" without power behind them are merely ideas, not rights.
The only right worthy of the name is one that others will exert force to ensure its reality.
The US government arm of such force is one that, theoretically, proceeds from authorization from the constitution on down, through power enabled by constitutionally compliant legislation. Unfortunately, as the USG rarely bothers with the authorization step these days, particularly as it relates to any supposed rights of the citizens, it's down to nothing but exertion of power with few, or no, checks.
So, again: a "right" without power behind it, as far as the USG is concerned, is no right at all.
We're not to a place where our citizens are willing, or able, to assert power to back any rights they might want, either. Although I do think I am sensing a bit more hot air being spewed lately.