Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 15 submissions in the queue.
posted by martyb on Friday March 23 2018, @03:02PM   Printer-friendly
from the I-remember-core-memory dept.

Samsung has demonstrated 64 GB RDIMMs using 16 Gb DDR4 memory chips, and plans to make 128 GB and 256 GB modules later this year:

Samsung is demonstrating its 64 GB DDR4 memory module based on 16 Gb chips this week at the OCP U.S. Summit. The 64 GB RDIMM that the company is showcasing is designed for mainstream servers, but ultimately the design will lend itself to build 128 GB and 256 GB memory modules for high-performance servers, the company said.

Samsung's monolithic 16 Gb DDR4 DRAM chips are rated for DDR4-2666 at the industry-standard 1.2 V. The chips are produced using an advanced manufacturing technology, but Samsung does not disclose details at the moment (it is logical to expect Samsung to use its '10-nm-class' tech though). The only thing we do know is that the fabrication process and monolithic die enable 20% lower power consumption of the demonstrated 64 GB RDIMM when compared to a module of the same capacity based on 8 Gb DDR4 chips.

In addition to the new dual-rank 64 GB RDIMM module, Samsung is set to develop quad-ranked 128 GB RDIMMs and octal-ranked 256 GB LRDIMMs. Today's servers running AMD's EPYC or Intel's Xeon Scalable M-suffixed processors feature 12 or 16 memory slots - if the processors were capable of fitting all 256 GB modules, this could lead up to 4 TB per socket. This should be a massive advantage for applications like in-memory databases, virtual desktop infrastructure, and so on.

16 Gb chips may also end up being used in 32 GB memory modules for desktop users.

DDR4 RDIMM and LRDIMM Performance Comparison

Also at Samsung.

Related: Samsung Mass Produces 128 GB DDR4 Server Memory


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1) by cocaine overdose on Friday March 23 2018, @11:58PM

    There was a time where prevention could've been swift and simple, that time is gone now. It's a shame that the only people pushing for better tech are mostly braindead (web developers, startup "full stack engineers," etc.) in the simplicity/lightweight/secure/private department. While the people who are pushing for more secure/simple/lightweight/private tech are retard-headed in the useability and feature department. FOSS developers are notorious for putting their licenses above their code quality and UX. Commercial developers are notorious for putting everything under UX.