From the Vox:
Many American pundits seem to firmly believe that the country stands at a precipice in which young, left-wing college students and recent graduates are the leading edge of a rising tide of illiberalism that comes in the form of “political correctness” and poses a clear and present danger to free speech and rational discourse.
[...] The alarm about student protesters, in other words, though not always mistaken about particular cases, is generally grounded in a completely mistaken view of the big-picture state of American society and public opinion, both on and off campus.
[...] Since the 1970s, the General Social Survey has posed a question about whether five hypothetical speakers should be allowed to give a speech in your community — a communist, a homosexual, an opponent of all religion, a racist, and a person who favors replacing the elected government with a military coup.
Justin Murphy of the University of Southampton in the United Kingdom aggregated trend data about all five kinds of speakers and found that public support for free expression has been generally rising
(Score: 5, Insightful) by Azuma Hazuki on Monday March 26 2018, @02:15AM (9 children)
There has never been a powerful left wing in the US, and there has barely ever been a left wing at all. The Overton Window is so far to the right now that if Reagan were running on his original platform even the Dems wouldn't want him. Or are you too young to remember presidents of the late 60s through late 70s and early 80s calling for universal healthcare? There is video of Nixon saying that, IIRC.
I am "that girl" your mother warned you about...
(Score: 2) by FatPhil on Monday March 26 2018, @12:18PM (1 child)
Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves
(Score: 2) by Azuma Hazuki on Monday March 26 2018, @07:16PM
That sounds solidly centrist to me, and also like excellent domestic statecraft :)
I am "that girl" your mother warned you about...
(Score: 2) by mobydisk on Monday March 26 2018, @05:12PM (6 children)
What Nixon meant by "universal heathcare" was completely different from what people think of today. Nixon meant that employers should offer healthcare coverage and employees should pay a portion of it. Today "universal heathcare" means the government pays 100% of it.
(Score: 3, Flamebait) by Azuma Hazuki on Monday March 26 2018, @07:15PM (5 children)
No, you illiterate moron, universal healthcare means the government is the single *insurer.* *We* would pay for it, via taxes.
I am "that girl" your mother warned you about...
(Score: 1, Redundant) by mobydisk on Monday March 26 2018, @07:34PM (2 children)
I'm unsure how a post starting with "No, you illiterate moron" as the first sentence got modded up. But either way, you confirmed my point, which is that the definition of universal healthcare has changed since the Nixon era.
(Score: 2) by Azuma Hazuki on Monday March 26 2018, @07:53PM (1 child)
Whatever he meant by it, he still called for it. Can you imagine the utter shrieking rightwing shitstorm there would be if a modern President suggested that?
I am "that girl" your mother warned you about...
(Score: 3, Insightful) by toddestan on Tuesday March 27 2018, @02:35AM
A lot depends on who says it. Remember that Obamacare in many ways is just a nation-wide implementation of Romneycare. Which is one of those facts that doesn't fit into the Republican narrative so it tends to get ignored.
(Score: -1, Troll) by Anonymous Coward on Monday March 26 2018, @08:17PM (1 child)
Your immature insults immediate discredit anything you might have said after. Someone disagreed with you. That is the beginning and end of it. You don't need to insult people to convey any points you have. Stating your rebuttal is plenty.
(Score: 2) by Azuma Hazuki on Monday March 26 2018, @09:03PM
Tone trolling has replaced patriotism as the last refuge of the scoundrel. Ponder that a moment; tone does not make the content any more or less true.
I am "that girl" your mother warned you about...