Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Saturday March 31 2018, @12:58AM   Printer-friendly
from the it-caught-me-too dept.

Here's a quick quiz for you:

In the biblical story, what was Jonah swallowed by?
How many animals of each kind did Moses take on the Ark?

Did you answer "whale" to the first question and "two" to the second? Most people do ... even though they're well aware that it was Noah, not Moses who built the ark in the biblical story.

Psychologists like me call this phenomenon the Moses Illusion. It's just one example of how people are very bad at picking up on factual errors in the world around them. Even when people know the correct information, they often fail to notice errors and will even go on to use that incorrect information in other situations.

Research from cognitive psychology shows that people are naturally poor fact-checkers and it is very difficult for us to compare things we read or hear to what we already know about a topic. In what's been called an era of "fake news," this reality has important implications for how people consume journalism, social media and other public information.

The Moses Illusion has been studied repeatedly since the 1980s. It occurs with a variety of questions and the key finding is that – even though people know the correct information – they don't notice the error and proceed to answer the question.

[...] Detecting and correcting false information is difficult work and requires fighting against the ways our brains like to process information. Critical thinking alone won't save us. Our psychological quirks put us at risk of falling for misinformation, disinformation and propaganda. Professional fact-checkers provide an essential service in hunting out incorrect information in the public view. As such, they are one of our best hopes for zeroing in on errors and correcting them, before the rest of us read or hear the false information and incorporate it into what we know of the world.

https://theconversation.com/why-you-stink-at-fact-checking-93997

[Related]:
[PDF] Moses illusion: Implication for human cognition

Moses strikes again: Focalization effect on a semantic illusion

Knowledge neglect

Although the title seems click-baity, this is an interesting article. As most of you are techies, you must have faced a few problems with regard to fact-checking. What do you think about this phenomenon ?


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday March 31 2018, @07:14PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday March 31 2018, @07:14PM (#660921)
    Yeah when you're dealing with "normal" people they are imprecise/inaccurate/mistaken most of the time. If you spend your time focusing on (or worse pointing out) every mistake they make you're not going to get far.

    So when a normal person asks that question they normally mean Noah and not Moses. Because Moses didn't take animals into his ark (Moses' Ark was the Ark of the Covenant).

    In a normal person's model of the questioner's thinking , the questioner is thinking of some character in the Bible and wants to know how many animals of each kind that character was taking into the ark. So for the question and questioner the name isn't the top priority, the biblical character is already "identified" by the questioner's description of what the character did, and the questioner wants to know more details of what happened.

    More examples: if someone says "My Email is not working" you assume they are having problems using their email program/service, not that a particular email message is not working. Similar for "The Internet is down" complaints.

    Or you visit some primitive peoples and they ask about the big bird you were inside, you assume they meant the plane arrived in. Both communicating parties have models in their mind, the words are to change the models.

    p.s. FWIW according to the Bible for the "unclean" animals, Noah took a pair of each kind, for the "clean" ones Noah took 7 pairs.