Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Saturday March 31 2018, @02:24AM   Printer-friendly
from the start-of-the-end dept.

From the NY Times: "The Windows era at Microsoft, long in eclipse, is officially history. Microsoft said on Tuesday that it was splitting up its Windows engineering team and that the leader of its Windows business was leaving."

Microsoft is ready for a world beyond Windows

"We want to move from people needing Windows to choosing Windows, to loving Windows. That is our bold goal," said Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella three years ago. At the time, Microsoft was unveiling more details about Windows 10, and surprising people with technologies like the HoloLens headset. It was an exciting time of opportunity and optimism that had Microsoft betting on people loving Windows so much that Windows 10 would be running on 1 billion devices within three years. Neither wager worked out — which is fine, because Windows as we know it is no longer critical to Microsoft's future success.

Microsoft announced a new reorganization yesterday. It's the fourth major shuffle inside the company over the past five years, and the most significant of Nadella's tenure. Microsoft is splitting Windows across the company, into different parts. Terry Myerson, a 21-year Microsoft veteran, is leaving the company and his role as Windows chief. The core development of Windows is being moved to a cloud and AI team, and a new team will take over the "experiences" Windows 10 users see like apps, the Start menu, and new features. There's a lot of shuffling going on, but Nadella's 1,300 word memo leaves little doubt over the company's true future: cloud and AI.


Original Submission #1   Original Submission #2

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 5, Insightful) by Virindi on Saturday March 31 2018, @08:55PM

    by Virindi (3484) on Saturday March 31 2018, @08:55PM (#660940)

    Yes, and I think the reputation of PCs of being insecure, hard to use, bloaty, and annoying is a big part of the success of tablets.

    Look at what people were using just before tablets: netbooks that had a stripped down set of hardware and Windows (MS went out of their way to kill off any Linux netbook attempts). Because of the nature of Windows, these devices had way too little in the way of hardware for the software that came on them. Thus, they were slow and generally a bad experience.

    MS has been trying to sell tablets with Windows on them since the 1990s, including a large push to make them in a similar hardware era to the dawn of the smartphone (they called it the "UMPC"). The problem was the same as always: crap software caused the hardware requirements to be out of control, resulting in a clunky product with short battery life.

    Tablet versions of Windows have existed for pretty much every version since Win3.1.

    The same problems apply to the various iterations of a Microsoft smartphone. They have been making them since the 1990s (Windows CE...). However, "mobile Windows" devices have always cost more and been less capable than the competition. The more recent (last 10 years) Windows Phone attempts have been particularly bad; every new version was a complete reboot, the builtin software barely worked, and the hardware was clunky.

    MS drove people away from their own stuff.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +3  
       Insightful=1, Interesting=1, Informative=1, Total=3
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   5