A disputed paper that raised questions about the safety of CRISPR has been retracted:
A scientific paper that purported to lay bare serious flaws in the gene-editing tool known as CRISPR and briefly tanked shares of genome-editing companies has been retracted by its publisher.
The paper [DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.4293] [DX], published last year in Nature Methods, claimed that CRISPR wreaked havoc on the genome, causing hundreds of unintended mutations in mice — and that the algorithms typically used to detect these changes were routinely missing them.
[...] Two months after publication of the paper, Nature Methods published an "an expression of concern" about the paper in July. The retraction notice, appended Friday, goes further, saying the authors did not use mice that had been bred in their own laboratory — so they could not know if any genetic mutations were the result of their intervention with CRISPR editing, or if it stemmed from variations in the mice's own genomes.
Nature Methods editorial discussing the retraction: CRISPR off-targets: a reassessment (open, DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.4664) (DX)
Previously: CRISPR Safer than Thought; Misleading Study Found Shared Mutations in Closely Related Mice
(Score: -1, Troll) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday April 05 2018, @11:49AM (3 children)
The only reason you'd say "[Citation needed]" is because you're a lazy fucking louse who never bothered to look into the matter.
(Score: 2) by c0lo on Thursday April 05 2018, @09:57PM (2 children)
It's the claimant duty to provide the evidence for the claims.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
(Score: -1, Troll) by Anonymous Coward on Friday April 06 2018, @01:24PM (1 child)
Google it, asshole.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday April 06 2018, @01:51PM
Were you born an idiot or did they nurtured this way?