Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by chromas on Thursday April 05 2018, @04:40AM   Printer-friendly
from the remember-the-printers dept.

Richard Stallman writes in the Guardian:

Journalists have been asking me whether the revulsion against the abuse of Facebook data could be a turning point for the campaign to recover privacy. That could happen, if the public makes its campaign broader and deeper.

Broader, meaning extending to all surveillance systems, not just Facebook. Deeper, meaning to advance from regulating the use of data to regulating the accumulation of data. Because surveillance is so pervasive, restoring privacy is necessarily a big change, and requires powerful measures.

The surveillance imposed on us today far exceeds that of the Soviet Union. For freedom and democracy's sake, we need to eliminate most of it. There are so many ways to use data to hurt people that the only safe database is the one that was never collected. Thus, instead of the EU's approach of mainly regulating how personal data may be used (in its General Data Protection Regulation or GDPR), I propose a law to stop systems from collecting personal data.

The robust way to do that, the way that can't be set aside at the whim of a government, is to require systems to be built so as not to collect data about a person. The basic principle is that a system must be designed not to collect certain data, if its basic function can be carried out without that data.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Pav on Thursday April 05 2018, @12:27PM (4 children)

    by Pav (114) on Thursday April 05 2018, @12:27PM (#662889)

    For ISP hosted services... people already get email. Just bundle social media equivalents, either in the base fee, or as extras. It gives the ISPs some extras to sell without the net neutrality BS.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by letssee on Thursday April 05 2018, @12:41PM (2 children)

    by letssee (2537) on Thursday April 05 2018, @12:41PM (#662893)

    Methinks you need to read up on what net neutrality means. If an isp needs to differentiate traffic to facebook from other traffic it's no longer neutral.

    Don't get me wrong, please tax Facebook out of existence. But the ISP's are exactly the wrong party to handle that.

    • (Score: 2) by Pav on Thursday April 05 2018, @12:58PM

      by Pav (114) on Thursday April 05 2018, @12:58PM (#662895)

      Not Facebook... We were talking about a federated Facebook equivalent (like Diaspora etc...).

    • (Score: 5, Insightful) by chromas on Thursday April 05 2018, @05:51PM

      by chromas (34) Subscriber Badge on Thursday April 05 2018, @05:51PM (#663022) Journal

      Back in þe olden times, some ISPs used to run web servers for customers to put up their own sites. But also, they usually host customer email and maybe usenet servers. He probably meant something like that.

  • (Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Friday April 06 2018, @05:38AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday April 06 2018, @05:38AM (#663280)

    Um, yeah; we called it 'usenet'.