Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by chromas on Thursday April 05 2018, @04:40AM   Printer-friendly
from the remember-the-printers dept.

Richard Stallman writes in the Guardian:

Journalists have been asking me whether the revulsion against the abuse of Facebook data could be a turning point for the campaign to recover privacy. That could happen, if the public makes its campaign broader and deeper.

Broader, meaning extending to all surveillance systems, not just Facebook. Deeper, meaning to advance from regulating the use of data to regulating the accumulation of data. Because surveillance is so pervasive, restoring privacy is necessarily a big change, and requires powerful measures.

The surveillance imposed on us today far exceeds that of the Soviet Union. For freedom and democracy's sake, we need to eliminate most of it. There are so many ways to use data to hurt people that the only safe database is the one that was never collected. Thus, instead of the EU's approach of mainly regulating how personal data may be used (in its General Data Protection Regulation or GDPR), I propose a law to stop systems from collecting personal data.

The robust way to do that, the way that can't be set aside at the whim of a government, is to require systems to be built so as not to collect data about a person. The basic principle is that a system must be designed not to collect certain data, if its basic function can be carried out without that data.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday April 05 2018, @04:24PM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday April 05 2018, @04:24PM (#662994)

    Enough said.

  • (Score: 2) by meustrus on Friday April 06 2018, @08:57PM

    by meustrus (4961) on Friday April 06 2018, @08:57PM (#663546)

    Actually, tech is perhaps the most under-regulated industry in America right now. Mostly because we have only come to understand tech enough to regulate it in the post-Reagan deregulation era. There is a notable exception however for the telecoms, who still contend with (and benefit from) regulation aimed at telephone and broadcast TV communication.

    But in virtually any other industry - agriculture, medicine, finance, manufacturing, entertainment, retail, and logistics all come immediately to mind - you would be absolutely correct.

    --
    If there isn't at least one reference or primary source, it's not +1 Informative. Maybe the underused +1 Interesting?