Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by mrpg on Thursday April 05 2018, @12:00PM   Printer-friendly
from the it's-in-the-air dept.

Local cops have responded to more than a dozen calls of raccoons acting "extremely strange."

[...] This March, residents of Youngstown, Ohio, began noticing something weird about their local raccoon population. The animals were coming out during the day and standing on their back legs, bearing their teeth and staggering around like extras in a George Romero movie, WKBN reports.

"[The raccoon] would stand up on his hind legs, which I've never seen a raccoon do before, and he would show his teeth and then he would fall over backward and go into almost a comatose condition," Robert Coggeshall, who was walking his dogs when he spotted the raccoon in question, told WKBN. Eventually, the raccoon would shake itself out of the daze, rise back up to its hind legs, and stagger forward, before repeating the whole process over again. It was, to put it in Coggeshall's words, "extremely strange."

[...] No one is certain exactly what is causing the weird-ass behavior, but the Ohio Department of Natural Resources says the raccoons may be suffering from a disease called distemper, rather than rabies.

'Zombie Raccoons' Are Traumatizing an Ohio Town


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday April 05 2018, @01:23PM (6 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday April 05 2018, @01:23PM (#662901)

    I hate every idiots these days who think they need to write "disclosure" on every frickin' post. Disclosures are meant to point to a possible conflict of interest, not "hey guys, I have some experience in this area."

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +1  
       Flamebait=1, Insightful=1, Touché=1, Total=3
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   1  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday April 05 2018, @01:30PM (3 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday April 05 2018, @01:30PM (#662903)

    Considering your grammar is sub-par, you are not in a position to complain.

    • (Score: 3, Touché) by The Mighty Buzzard on Thursday April 05 2018, @02:00PM (2 children)

      by The Mighty Buzzard (18) Subscriber Badge <themightybuzzard@proton.me> on Thursday April 05 2018, @02:00PM (#662922) Homepage Journal

      Man, there's no need to go talking bad about someone's grammar. I mean ad hom's one thing but stick to the feller posting not little old ladies who ain't here to defend themselves.

      --
      My rights don't end where your fear begins.
      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday April 05 2018, @02:34PM (1 child)

        by Anonymous Coward on Thursday April 05 2018, @02:34PM (#662936)

        Ya ya little old ladies are YOU turf we GET IT already.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday April 05 2018, @03:56PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday April 05 2018, @03:56PM (#662980)

    I hate every idiots these days who think they need to write "disclosure" on every frickin' post. Disclosures are meant to point to a possible conflict of interest, not "hey guys, I have some experience in this area."

    I hate every idiot that hides their conflicts of interest so they can portray themselves as having expertise without being truthful about where their experience and paychecks come from.

  • (Score: 2) by FatPhil on Friday April 06 2018, @09:23AM

    by FatPhil (863) <{pc-soylent} {at} {asdf.fi}> on Friday April 06 2018, @09:23AM (#663349) Homepage
    "every frinkin' post"

    Wow. It's the first time I've noticed it, and I only noticed it because you so rudely drew my attention to it. When I read it, I simply interpreted it as "for those who are wondering what credentials I have that permit me to be so specific", but using one word rather than many, which would be a positive thing. And of course, if the agency he worked for has any bias, justified or not, which might make them unusually likely to draw particular conclusions (such as being an enemy of the petrochemical industry), then "disclaimer" would be entirely appropriate.

    Disclaimer: I'm old enough to have studied "rhetoric" at school, love a good shitpost, and have asbestos underpants.
    --
    Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves