Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by chromas on Friday April 06 2018, @03:45AM   Printer-friendly
from the crops-from-outer-space dept.

Scientists have harvested the first vegetables grown in the EDEN-ISS greenhouse at Germany's Neumeyer-Station III in Antarctica. 3.6 kg of salad greens, 18 cucumbers, and 70 radishes were grown inside the greenhouse, which uses a closed water cycle with no soil.

An air management system controls the temperature and humidity, removes contaminants (such as ethylene, microbes, and viruses) and regulates the amount of oxygen and carbon dioxide to optimize growth. Water-cooled LEDs deliver lighting with a spectrum that is 15% blue (400-500 nm), 10% green (500-600 nm), ~75% red (600-700 nm), and ~2% far-red (700-750 nm). A nutrient delivery system stores stock solutions, acids/bases, deionized water, and nutrient solution, and pumps them into the cultivation system as needed.

The final crop yield for the shipping container sized facility is estimated to be 4.25 kg per week (250g each of lettuce, chard, rugula, and spinach, 1 kg of tomatoes, 600g of sweet peppers, 1 kg of cucumbers, 250g of radishes, 100g of strawberries, and 300g of herbs). The purpose of the project is to test food production technologies that could be used on the International Space System, Moon, Mars missions, etc. It will also provide fresh food supplementation year-round for the crew of Neumeyer-Station III (estimated population of 9 in the winter, 50 in the summer).

EDEN-ISS has some advantages (open, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.60431) (DX) over the ISS's current Veggie system, including a higher available growth surface, longer possible production cycle using complete nutrient solution circulation, better reliability and safety, and the ability to grow taller crops (up to 60 cm). The system is designed to be flown to the ISS as a payload of EDR II experimental inserts.

Related: Tomorrow, NASA Astronauts Will Finally Eat Fresh, Microgravity-Grown Veggies
SpaceX Launches CRS-14 Resupply Mission to the ISS (carried the competing Passive Orbital Nutrient Delivery System)


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by c0lo on Friday April 06 2018, @01:50PM (4 children)

    by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Friday April 06 2018, @01:50PM (#663416) Journal

    Mercury... may be the better choice for a small colony.

    I wouldn’t like to be there during solar storms.
    Bremsstrahlung radiation from those energetic charged particle and huge flux values must be horrendous.

    --
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by GreatAuntAnesthesia on Friday April 06 2018, @03:37PM (3 children)

    by GreatAuntAnesthesia (3275) on Friday April 06 2018, @03:37PM (#663455) Journal

    Mercury is tidally locked. One side is insanely hot and bathed in solar radiation, the other side is permanently in shadow and cold.

    Any colony would most likely be built on the terminator between these two extreme environments. That way you could benefit from both: Solar panels on the hot side, sending their output via cables running a few tens of kilometres to the habitats which would be entirely or mostly in the shade, shielded from the sun's glare and lit by artificial light.

    Alternatively, you could build on the shady side, near the terminator, and then build mirrors on very tall towers that peek over the horizon to reflect life-giving sunlight (but not the deadly radiation) down onto your colony. The mirrors could even be angled to "on" and "off" positions regularly to simulate a human & plant-friendly day / night cycle.

    • (Score: 2) by GreatAuntAnesthesia on Friday April 06 2018, @03:45PM

      by GreatAuntAnesthesia (3275) on Friday April 06 2018, @03:45PM (#663457) Journal

      Scrap that last comment: I was wrong, Mercury isn't tidally locked at all. It rotates, albeit very very slowly.

    • (Score: 2) by takyon on Friday April 06 2018, @03:50PM

      by takyon (881) <takyonNO@SPAMsoylentnews.org> on Friday April 06 2018, @03:50PM (#663458) Journal

      https://www.universetoday.com/130109/how-do-we-colonize-mercury/ [universetoday.com]
      https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:North_pole_of_Mercury_--_NASA.jpg [wikimedia.org]

      You want to set up shop in the shaded polar region, which has evidence of water ice.

      The Universe Today article suggests using satellites to gather solar energy and then beaming it down to the surface (or even to other parts of the solar system), but I assume you could just put panels on the surface and run transmission lines to the polar craters.

      --
      [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
    • (Score: 2) by c0lo on Friday April 06 2018, @04:03PM

      by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Friday April 06 2018, @04:03PM (#663462) Journal

      Mercury is tidally locked. One side is insanely hot and bathed in solar radiation, the other side is permanently in shadow and cold.

      Mercury has a 3:2 spin–orbit resonance. 3 days every 2 tears in Mercury terms.

      Any colony would most likely be built on the terminator between these two extreme environments.

      A colony on the terminator will need to move some tens or hundred of metres/hour - too lazy to do the actual calculation, but I believe a speed achievable by a human walking (EVAs would be possible).

      --
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford