Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Tuesday April 10 2018, @06:50PM   Printer-friendly
from the having-a-smashing-time dept.

Higgs factory a 'must for big physics'

A top physicist says the construction of a "factory" to produce Higgs boson particles is a priority for the science community. In an exclusive interview, Nigel Lockyer, head of America's premier particle physics lab, said studying the Higgs could hasten major discoveries. He said momentum in the physics community was gathering for a machine to be built either in Europe or Asia. "Our field uniformly agrees that would be a good thing," he told the BBC. The Fermilab director added: "The Higgs is such an interesting particle - a unique particle."

[...] Physicists had hoped that the LHC would turn up evidence of physics phenomena not explained by the Standard Model. So far, efforts to detect new physics have come away empty-handed, but studying the Higgs in more detail might break the impasse.

A successor to the Large Hadron Collider would be designed in a way that allows scientists to zero in on the Higgs boson. The LHC works by smashing beams of proton particles together, but the collisions that produce the Higgs also produce many other particles. This makes it complicated to work out which collisions produce the Higgs boson. A different type of particle smasher, called an electron-positron collider, should produce only a Higgs and another particle called a Z boson.

This makes it more suitable for detailed study of the Higgs' properties. Dr Lockyer said there were currently discussions over a new electron-positron collider in China, and a linear collider that could function as a Higgs factory in Japan. Alternatively, it could be housed at Cern after the Large Hadron Collider comes to the end of its operating lifetime. [...] But he stressed that there was still plenty to come from the LHC, which will undergo a major upgrade in the 2020s.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by maxwell demon on Tuesday April 10 2018, @08:26PM (3 children)

    by maxwell demon (1608) on Tuesday April 10 2018, @08:26PM (#665087) Journal

    A different type of particle smasher, called an electron-positron collider, should produce only a Higgs and another particle called a Z boson.

    You mean, the successor of the LHC will be a Large Electron-Positron Collider? [wikipedia.org] ;-)

    --
    The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday April 10 2018, @10:46PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday April 10 2018, @10:46PM (#665129)

    Do you propose a time recyclotron?

  • (Score: 1) by khallow on Wednesday April 11 2018, @05:41AM (1 child)

    by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday April 11 2018, @05:41AM (#665249) Journal

    A different type of particle smasher, called an electron-positron collider, should produce only a Higgs and another particle called a Z boson.

    Hrmmm, seems far more likely to produce a huge amount of gamma rays since that is the usual product of electron-positron collisions. I can see elementary particle collisions being simpler than protons which are thought to be quark triplets and thus, not a simple particle. But they're still going to spew a lot of stuff unrelated to the desired bosons above.