Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Wednesday April 11 2018, @11:04PM   Printer-friendly
from the different-kind-of-courage dept.

Dr. John Plunkett died this week. He spent nearly 20 years arguing in court against bad forensic science, for which he was maliciously prosecuted and received false ethics complaints. Through his efforts, 300 innocent people were exonerated. (This sentence from fark.com)

Like a lot of other doctors, child welfare advocates and forensic specialists, John Plunkett at first bought into the theory of Shaken Baby Syndrome (SBS). It's a convenient diagnosis for prosecutors, in that it provides a cause of death (violent shaking), a culprit (whoever was last with the child before death) and even intent (prosecutors often argue that the violent, extended shaking establishes mens rea.) But in the late 1990s, Plunkett — a forensic pathologist in Minnesota — began to have doubts about the diagnosis. The same year his study was published, Plunkett testified in the trial of Lisa Stickney, a licensed day care worker in Oregon. Thanks in large part to Plunkett's testimony, Stickney was acquitted. District Attorney Michael Dugan responded with something unprecedented — it criminally charged an expert witness over testimony he had given in court. Today, the scientific consensus on SBS has since shifted significantly in Plunkett's direction.

[...] According to the National Registry of Exonerations, 16 SBS convictions have been overturned. Plunkett's obituary puts the figure at 300, and claims that he participated in 50 of those cases. I'm not sure of the source for that figure, and it's the first I've seen of it. But whatever the number, Plunkett deserves credit for being among the first to sound the alarm about wrongful SBS convictions. His study was the first step toward those exonerations.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: -1, Flamebait) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday April 11 2018, @11:43PM (5 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday April 11 2018, @11:43PM (#665629)

    Other offspring, also carrying similar DNA, will have better chances if excessively troublesome offspring are eliminated. When a baby just screams constantly, and no cause can be found, that baby is a detriment to the family and the propagation of their DNA.

    Trouble is, modern society makes no allowance for getting rid of failed offspring.

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   -1  
       Flamebait=2, Interesting=1, Total=3
    Extra 'Flamebait' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   -1  
  • (Score: 2, Informative) by Sulla on Wednesday April 11 2018, @11:58PM (3 children)

    by Sulla (5173) on Wednesday April 11 2018, @11:58PM (#665637) Journal

    So I had twin boys a couple of years ago, one of them with colic and one of them without colic. Colic is pretty annoying to deal with, and I decided to look up any studies tying longterm life success/issues and colic as an infant.

    https://www.webmd.com/parenting/baby/news/20000313/colicky-babies-may-be-more-emotional-later#1 [webmd.com]

    Their study, published in the journal Acta Paediatrica, looked at 50 children who had colic, along with 100 who didn't. The researchers found that by age 4, the colicky and noncolicky children were essentially the same in eating and sleeping habits, temperament, and behavior -- except for emotional outbursts.

    Anecdotally I can say that this appears to be true, at least comparing my twin boys. I wonder how much the child getting more attention paid to it during the colic phase and the immediate response of parents trying to make it quiet down has to do with the kid thinking it can get away with more later in life. Colic may train kids that outbursts get them the attention they want.

    https://www.babble.com/parenting/the-unspoken-long-term-effect-of-colic-post-colic-stress-syndrome/ [babble.com]

    Not the line of ridiculousness, but the imaginary line that lived only in my head: he’d crossed the I’ve-been-traumatized-by-colic threshold. I knew when he made that comment that he’d forgotten. There was a reason our two kids were far apart in age: we were still recovering from the traumatic experience of colic and reflux with our first. It scarred us; I’m still just getting past it.

    Woman complaining about PTSD from having a kid with colic and how it kept her from having more kids. So a weak mother and a colicy kid might reduce number of potential offspring and be bad for the species.

    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0161475409002036 [sciencedirect.com]

    Untreated post-colicky infants demonstrated negative behavioral patterns at 2 to 3 years of age. In this study, parents of infants treated with chiropractic care for excessive crying did not report as many difficult behavioral and sleep patterns of their toddlers. These findings suggest that chiropractic care for infants with colic may have an effect on long-term sequelae.

    Kind of unrelated but the report claims that kids with colic that are treated by a chiropractor suffer less longterm temperament issues. Sounds like a scam to get you into the bone doctor to me.

    --
    Ceterum censeo Sinae esse delendam
    • (Score: 3, Insightful) by frojack on Thursday April 12 2018, @12:17AM (1 child)

      by frojack (1554) on Thursday April 12 2018, @12:17AM (#665648) Journal

      chiropractic care for excessive crying

      Sure all the kid need is a subluxation adjustment.

      If you had a point in this post, you blew it all to hell quoting the chrio-quacks self-serving studies.

      --
      No, you are mistaken. I've always had this sig.
      • (Score: 1) by Sulla on Thursday April 12 2018, @03:59AM

        by Sulla (5173) on Thursday April 12 2018, @03:59AM (#665739) Journal

        I found it funny as hell and wanted to include it

        --
        Ceterum censeo Sinae esse delendam
    • (Score: 4, Interesting) by LoRdTAW on Thursday April 12 2018, @12:31AM

      by LoRdTAW (3755) on Thursday April 12 2018, @12:31AM (#665658) Journal

      Colic may train kids that outbursts get them the attention they want.

      Interestingly enough, my mother told me I was colicky when I was a baby and simply took her doctors advice, leave him in his crib, alone and let him cry his head off until he falls asleep. And you know what, I turned out just fine as a person. I'm not happy, that's depression, ADD and whatever else is lurking, but I'm a good person who's never done any one undeserved harm and only looks to help others. I'm not spoiled, impatient, or a dick and I never take my bullshit out on others or stomp around like a child when I'm upset. I keep my chin up and get my shit done as best I can.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday April 12 2018, @12:26AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday April 12 2018, @12:26AM (#665653)

    modern society makes no allowance for getting rid of failed offspring.

    You could just ship them off to SoylentNews! Failed offspring comes home to find the family moved, no forwarding address. But a note with a URL says, "Check out this cool website!"