Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 18 submissions in the queue.
posted by chromas on Saturday April 14 2018, @01:23AM   Printer-friendly
from the about-that-thing-you-thought-was-air-gapped... dept.

El Reg reports:

Data exfiltrators send info over PCs' power supply cables

Malware tickles unused cores to put signals in current

If you want your computer to be really secure, disconnect its power cable.
So says Mordechai Guri and his team of side-channel sleuths at the Ben-Gurion University of the Negev.

The crew have penned a paper titled PowerHammer: Exfiltrating Data from Air-Gapped Computers through Power Lines that explains how attackers could install malware that regulates CPU utilisation and creates fluctuations in the current flow that could modulate and encode data. The variations would be "propagated through the power lines" to the outside world.

Depending on the attacker's approach, data could be exfiltrated at between 10 and 1,000 bits-per-second. The higher speed would work if attackers can get at the cable connected to the computer's power supply. The slower speed works if attackers can only access a building's electrical services panel.

The PowerHammer malware spikes the CPU utilisation by choosing cores that aren't currently in use by user operations (to make it less noticeable).

Guri and his pals use frequency shift keying to encode data onto the line.

After that, it's pretty simple, because all the attacker needs is to decide where to put the receiver current clamp: near the target machine if you can get away with it, behind the switchboard if you have to.

This seems hinky to me.

First, there's the point that the bad guys will need PHYSICAL ACCESS to the premises or even to the individual machine.

Next, if the current clamp is put around the typical line cord, the sum of the current in the hot wire and the neutral (return) wire will be zero. (An inductive current sensor is typically put over only one of the wires, so they will need to do some surgery on that cable — which will be obvious.)

Putting a 100% online UPS between the computer and the AC power supply will also interfere. [ed.]


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by LoRdTAW on Saturday April 14 2018, @01:59AM (2 children)

    by LoRdTAW (3755) on Saturday April 14 2018, @01:59AM (#666732) Journal

    Next, if the current clamp is put around the typical line cord, the sum of the current in the hot wire and the neutral (return) wire will be zero. (An inductive current sensor is typically put over only one of the wires, so they will need to do some surgery on that cable — which will be obvious.)

    If they could gain access to a feeder and find the right phase then perhaps, yes. But I'd like to see how well this works in facilities full of motors and non-linear loads (switching supplies, VFD's, etc) barfing out tons of noise and harmonics. Have they tested real world and tried to find a suitable tap point to hook a current clamp and receive data?

    And how well does this work when a facility has an active power filer or static var generator that corrects power factor, harmonics and fluctuations?

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday April 14 2018, @04:33AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday April 14 2018, @04:33AM (#666792)

    barfing out tons of noise and harmonics

    Yup.
    Even 10bps sounds pretty blue-sky to me.

    -- OriginalOwner_ [soylentnews.org]

  • (Score: 2) by TheRaven on Saturday April 14 2018, @10:21AM

    by TheRaven (270) on Saturday April 14 2018, @10:21AM (#666861) Journal
    I also wonder how well it works with laptops. Is there noticeable variation in power consumption when the CPU power is buffered by the battery charging? Presumably it doesn't work at all while charging, because the PSU is providing power at maximum capacity and some of it is available to charge the battery in varying quantities depending on load. When the battery is charged, is the supply sufficiently insulated from the demand that you don't get any data, or do you just get a lower data rate?
    --
    sudo mod me up