Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 18 submissions in the queue.
posted by janrinok on Thursday April 26 2018, @10:47PM   Printer-friendly
from the walk-in-the-park dept.

Pennsylvania State University orders student groups to disband

BBC News reports:

A US college outdoors club is being disbanded because its activities, which include hiking, running and backpacking, are deemed too risky.

Pennsylvania State University officials said the group will be reconstituted to focus more on safety.

The 98-year-old Outing Club is one of three that will be disbanded from next semester: the caving and scuba clubs have also been deemed unsafe.


Original Submission #1Original Submission #2

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 4, Insightful) by All Your Lawn Are Belong To Us on Friday April 27 2018, @02:15PM (2 children)

    by All Your Lawn Are Belong To Us (6553) on Friday April 27 2018, @02:15PM (#672583) Journal

    Except that if you bothered to read TFA you'd see that part of the problem was consumption of alcohol during the student activities, which implies not enough supervision by staff to make sure that didn't happen.
    Liability insurances generally don't cover gross negligence. As in, "The university was actively aware that drinking was being allowed at these activities and their faculty/staff sponsors did nothing to curtail this, therefore this was wanton negligence. Therefore the university can pay out the settlement directly."

    Hiking, sure. Hiking and drinking on your own: stupid but in most places legal. Hiking and drinking in an event sanctioned by the organization.... yeah, like that should be allowed to happen.

    --
    This sig for rent.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +2  
       Insightful=2, Total=2
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   4  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday April 27 2018, @02:41PM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday April 27 2018, @02:41PM (#672587)

    Except that if you bothered to read TFA you'd see that part of the problem was consumption of alcohol during the student activities

    Except I was doing this stuff and drinking alcohol at 13 -- and two years later I was regularly drinking with my school teachers. Different time and different place but the core principle of responsibility, maturity and trust remain.

    Let's not forget why the drinking age is 21 in most states, [fee.org]

    • (Score: 2) by All Your Lawn Are Belong To Us on Friday April 27 2018, @07:20PM

      by All Your Lawn Are Belong To Us (6553) on Friday April 27 2018, @07:20PM (#672743) Journal

      Which only tangentially answers the point that the university would be directly responsible for any liability and injuries that occurred during the school-sanctioned events. And doesn't address at all that you can have 99 responsible, mature, and trustworthy individuals doing things responsibly. It only takes one to cause a multi-million dollar payout that insurance won't cover.

      And yes, different time and different place for me too. This isn't about individuals; this is about what risk is appropriate for a public university to take.

      And I'm fine with the 21 age limit, but I'm getting to be an old fart now. [cbsnews.com]

      --
      This sig for rent.