Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by takyon on Tuesday May 01 2018, @09:55PM   Printer-friendly
from the hot-water dept.

The Akademik Lomonosov, under construction since 2007, has been launched. The barge,

has a length of 144 metres (472 ft) and width of 30 metres (98 ft). It has a displacement of 21,500 tonnes and a crew of 69 people. For the power generation, it has two modified KLT-40 naval propulsion reactors together providing up to 70 MW of electricity or 300 MW of heat.

According to Engadget:

Starting from St Petersburg, it will be towed around Norway to a Russian town called Murmansk to take on nuclear fuel. From there, it will head to the Arctic to power the oil-industry town of Pevek, along with a desalination plant and drilling rigs. While it's not the first floating nuclear plant -- the US used one from 1968 to 1975 -- it will be the first one in almost 40 years.

Futurism reports that:

Rosatom, the government-owned Russian energy company that developed the Lomonosov, released a statement saying that the floating reactor will be "invincible" to tsunamis and other natural disasters, and that it has met all the requirements of the International Atomic Energy Agency. The company argues that they have rendered Lomonosov harmless to the environment.

A press release from Greenpeace says:

The floating nuclear power plant was initially supposed to be loaded with nuclear fuel and tested on site in the centre of St. Petersburg. However, due to pressure from the Baltic states and a successful petition organised by Greenpeace Russia, Rosatom, the state-controlled nuclear giant that owns and operates the floating nuclear power plant, decided on 21 July 2017 to move loading and testing to Murmansk.

A 2013 RT article said:

The Akademik Lomonosov is to become the spearhead of a series of floating nuclear power plants, which Russia plans to put into mass-production.
[...]

15 countries, including China, Indonesia, Malaysia, Algeria, Namibia, Cape Verde and Argentina, have previously expressed interest in acquiring such power stations.

The Times of London has an infographic that can be viewed by non-subscribers.

Science Magazine has a loosely related article, Floating Nuclear Plants: Power from the Assembly Line; the first page can be viewed by non-subscribers.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 5, Informative) by c0lo on Tuesday May 01 2018, @11:42PM (5 children)

    by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday May 01 2018, @11:42PM (#674364) Journal

    Unlike Arizona**, in Siberia you need serious heating, that power is not to be dumped in the sea.

    --
    ** Palo Verde nuke reactors [wikipedia.org] are located there and they didn't scorched the earth around, in spite of generating almost 4GW.

    --
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +3  
       Informative=3, Total=3
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   5  
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by sjames on Wednesday May 02 2018, @01:29AM (3 children)

    by sjames (2882) on Wednesday May 02 2018, @01:29AM (#674387) Journal

    Exactly. Much of the waste heat will be dumped into the town's steam pipes and radiated into homes and businesses.

    • (Score: 1) by shrewdsheep on Wednesday May 02 2018, @09:11AM (2 children)

      by shrewdsheep (5215) on Wednesday May 02 2018, @09:11AM (#674502)

      I would be surprised to see this happen. This is Russian infrastructure we are talking about.

      • (Score: 2) by bob_super on Wednesday May 02 2018, @04:51PM (1 child)

        by bob_super (1357) on Wednesday May 02 2018, @04:51PM (#674653)

        Collective heat generation is a lot more common than you think.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday May 02 2018, @03:57AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday May 02 2018, @03:57AM (#674440)

    The relevant passage in the Wikipedia article:

    The facility evaporates water from the treated sewage of several nearby municipalities to meet its cooling needs. 20 billion US gallons (76,000,000 m³) of treated water are evaporated each year.[11][12] This water represents about 25% of the annual overdraft of the Arizona Department of Water Resources Phoenix Active Management Area.