In a ruling with potentially sweeping consequences for the so-called gig economy, the California Supreme Court on Monday made it much more difficult for companies to classify workers as independent contractors rather than employees.
The decision could eventually require companies like Uber, many of which are based in California, to follow minimum-wage and overtime laws and to pay workers' compensation and unemployment insurance and payroll taxes, potentially upending their business models.
Industry executives have estimated that classifying drivers and other gig workers as employees tends to cost 20 to 30 percent more than classifying them as contractors. It also brings benefits that can offset these costs, though, like the ability to control schedules and the manner of work.
"It's a massive thing — definitely a game-changer that will force everyone to take a fresh look at the whole issue," said Richard Meneghello, a co-chairman of the gig-economy practice group at the management-side law firm Fisher Phillips.
Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/30/business/economy/gig-economy-ruling.html
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday May 02 2018, @10:56PM (3 children)
Were you beaten with the clueless bat from birth?
(Score: 2, Insightful) by khallow on Thursday May 03 2018, @12:07AM (2 children)
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 03 2018, @02:18PM (1 child)
I'll point you to the comment directly below, maybe if you spent more time reading history uoud have a clue what I'm talking about. You are the ignorant one arguing from simplistic base assumptions here.
(Score: 1) by khallow on Thursday May 03 2018, @03:36PM
Umm, there is no comment directly below.
And what are you talking about?
I'm interested in the correctness of these arguments not their complexity.