Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Saturday May 05 2018, @03:25AM   Printer-friendly
from the no-problem-in-the-UK dept.

Hawaii will ban the sale of sunscreens containing oxybenzone and octinoxate, which have been found to be toxic to coral and algae. The ban would take effect in 2021, and wouldn't apply to prescription sunscreens, online purchases, or sunscreen brought from out of state.

Hawaii bans sunscreens with chemicals that damage coral reefs, but Australia reluctant to follow

But there is far less enthusiasm for a similar ban in Australia, with some experts questioning the evidence behind Hawaii's decision. [...] Hawaii's decision was partly based on a report from 2015.

[...] "It's still a matter of balancing our planet health with human health when we know that two out of three Australians will develop skin cancer in their lifetime," Cancer Council Australia CEO Sanchia Aranda said.

Professor Aranda said there was still no conclusive scientific evidence the chemicals caused coral bleaching. "If there was evidence for marine damage strongly and the TGA, who regulates sunscreen and the chemicals that go into sunscreen, believed that it was harmful, then we would also seek to support that," she said.

2015 study reported at UCF and NPR.

Toxicopathological Effects of the Sunscreen UV Filter, Oxybenzone (Benzophenone-3), on Coral Planulae and Cultured Primary Cells and Its Environmental Contamination in Hawaii and the U.S. Virgin Islands (DOI: 10.1007/s00244-015-0227-7) (DX)


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Virindi on Sunday May 06 2018, @04:49AM

    by Virindi (3484) on Sunday May 06 2018, @04:49AM (#676259)

    No, what I really mean is what I said: one study is not conclusive. Policy should not be made on the basis of a single study, no matter its quality. Coming to a conclusion cannot happen when only one group has put work into the subject; others must examine it as well. Any one study can be easily flawed in a way that goes unnoticed. The number of studies is important because it is a barometer for how many different groups have looked at the question from different angles.

    And throwing out pejoratives doesn't make your case sound any more reasonable, either.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2