Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by mrpg on Saturday May 12 2018, @03:58PM   Printer-friendly
from the that-explains-it dept.

[...] Play time is in short supply for children these days and the lifelong consequences for developing children can be more serious than many people realize.

An article in the most recent issue of the American Journal of Play details not only how much children's play time has declined, but how this lack of play affects emotional development, leading to the rise of anxiety, depression, and problems of attention and self control.

[...] Gray describes this kind of unstructured, freely-chosen play as a testing ground for life. It provides critical life experiences without which young children cannot develop into confident and competent adults. Gray's article is meant to serve as a wake-up call regarding the effects of lost play, and he believes that lack of childhood free play time is a huge loss that must be addressed for the sake of our children and society.

Parents who hover over and intrude on their children's play are a big part of the problem, according to Gray. "It is hard to find groups of children outdoors at all, and, if you do find them, they are likely to be wearing uniforms and following the directions of coaches while their parents dutifully watch and cheer." He cites a study which assessed the way 6- to 8-year-olds spent their time in 1981 and again in 1997.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday May 13 2018, @12:58AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday May 13 2018, @12:58AM (#679009)

    Just curious: Why don't you want to let social services walk into your home and open the fridge?

    Because it's none of their business and they should frankly have much less power than they do. Supposedly saving children is not an excuse to ignore due process or the notion of innocent unless proven guilty. But it seems that, when it comes to children, people shut their brains off (if they have brains to begin with, and I'm frankly not sure that authoritarians do) and will allow any atrocity to take place in the name of protecting them.

    By repeatedly fighting them and making it impossible for them to check on your place, you're raising their suspicions that you're doing something you shouldn't be doing.

    Nothing to hide, nothing to fear. That doesn't work as an argument for mass surveillance, and it doesn't work here, either.

    Alternately, you have people in town who have it out for you for reasons unrelated to your treatment of children. You might want to look into why you might have that kind of reputation.

    If people can use CPS that way, then maybe CPS has too much power to begin with. It is unjust to use such methods to destroy someone's life, even if their reputation is bad.

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +1  
       Informative=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   1