Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Sunday May 13 2018, @05:41PM   Printer-friendly
from the it's-not-a-drone dept.

NASA's next big Mars rover will include a helicopter designed to work in Mars's thin atmosphere:

When NASA launches its next rover to Mars, the vehicle will have a small helicopter along for the ride. NASA announced today that it will be sending a small autonomous flying chopper — aptly named the Mars Helicopter — with the upcoming Mars 2020 rover. The helicopter will attempt to fly through the Martian air to see if vehicles can even levitate on Mars, where the atmosphere is 100 times thinner than that of Earth.

The design for the Mars Helicopter has been in the works for the last four years at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, but the space agency had yet to decide if it was actually going to send the vehicle to Mars. NASA needed to determine if this technology was actually feasible and if the agency had enough money in its budget to include the copter, according to Spaceflight Now. Now it seems that the agency has decided that this copter idea could actually work.

One much better place in the solar system for a flying vehicle is Titan, which has lower surface gravity and a denser atmosphere than Earth.

Also at NASA and NYT.

Related: Titan Ripe for Drone Invasion
NASA New Frontiers Finalists: Comet 67P Sample Return and a Titan Drone


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by takyon on Sunday May 13 2018, @07:35PM (5 children)

    by takyon (881) <takyonNO@SPAMsoylentnews.org> on Sunday May 13 2018, @07:35PM (#679264) Journal

    Oh wow gee nobody thought of growing food there. Or using a BFR to leave.

    https://www.newscientist.com/article/2151285-how-we-could-make-oxygen-on-mars-plus-fuel-to-get-home/ [newscientist.com]
    http://www.sciencetimes.com/articles/6342/20150514/humans-may-not-have-to-carry-oxygen-to-mars.htm [sciencetimes.com]

    You could also use plants to produce more oxygen.

    --
    [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 1) by tftp on Sunday May 13 2018, @09:04PM (3 children)

    by tftp (806) on Sunday May 13 2018, @09:04PM (#679307) Homepage
    The more reasonable (not Musk's) approach calls for robots who will construct the city for humans to live in, with several advance deliveries. That will delay the human landing for a couple of decades, but will not look like a suicide mission. Leaving Mars would be possible, but not on a whim - perhaps, every 6 months at best.
    • (Score: 2) by takyon on Sunday May 13 2018, @09:27PM (2 children)

      by takyon (881) <takyonNO@SPAMsoylentnews.org> on Sunday May 13 2018, @09:27PM (#679317) Journal

      BFR could deliver the mass equivalent of the ISS to the surface of Mars in just 3 orbital-refueled trips.

      ISS [wikipedia.org] mass = 419,455 kg

      BFR [wikipedia.org] payload to Mars [wikipedia.org] with in-orbit refueling = 150,000 kg

      Sending enough food there for an ISS-like crew to live for months, and sending what they need to set up a greenhouse and machinery to produce propellant for a return trip using BFR is entirely possible, and doesn't require decades of delay or good robotic technology.

      Now I don't disagree that waiting a couple of decades and setting things up in advance with robots is a better idea. But I doubt that the initial forays into manned Mars exploration are going to (attempt to) produce a permanent colony. Even Musk doesn't have plans to pay for such an idea (at this point), he is just making the proposal and building the fully reusable and high-payload rocket he thinks will best facilitate colonization of Mars.

      --
      [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday May 14 2018, @06:18PM (1 child)

        by Anonymous Coward on Monday May 14 2018, @06:18PM (#679694)

        Even better, just bring the ISS to Mars when it's decomissioned.

        • (Score: 2) by takyon on Monday May 14 2018, @08:16PM

          by takyon (881) <takyonNO@SPAMsoylentnews.org> on Monday May 14 2018, @08:16PM (#679753) Journal

          Recent NASA plans for Mars called for humans to orbit Mars rather than land on it, in the early 2030s. If that continues to be the case, maybe they can throw the ISS over there at the same time. But that doesn't track with the administration's current plans to transition use of the ISS to private companies.

          --
          [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
  • (Score: 2) by realDonaldTrump on Monday May 14 2018, @06:37PM

    by realDonaldTrump (6614) on Monday May 14 2018, @06:37PM (#679709) Homepage Journal

    So true. You bring a potato. You poop on it, you water it. Eventually it makes food & air. Although the food is nothing but potatoes. Mars, possibly, will be known as the planet of french fries and vodka!