After huge amounts of coral bleaching and rising carbon emissions, the Great Barrier Reef could really use some good news. Sadly, that's not what it got this weekend.
A draft report from the Department of Environment and Energy recommends forest clearing should go ahead at northern Queensland's Kingvale Station, according to the Sydney Morning Herald. Prospective clearing was first authorised in 2014, and its purpose would be to make way for cropping and other activities.
Environment Minister Josh Frydenberg will rule on the matter, and if it goes forward it'll mean 2,000 hectares of forest areas right next to the Reef will be cleared. And that would almost certainly mean a soil pollution problem for the Reef.
[...] Not only is too much heat and light a problem, so is lack of sunlight. Sediment washed from the land into the Reef blocks sunlight onto the coral, restricting the necessary process of photosynthesis. It can also damage or kill some of the fauna supporting the ecosystem.
"Declining marine water quality, influenced by land-based run-off, is one of the most significant threats to the long-term health and resilience of the Great Barrier Reef." Ironically, that's a quote from the Queensland Government's State of the Environment page.
(Score: 2) by frojack on Tuesday May 15 2018, @02:21AM
Forestry has come a long way in recent years. Forest managers are loath to lose topsoil even more than farmers are.
Rivers are not generally full of silt near timber operations as the article suggests. People get fined for that
kind of stuff in some parts of the world.
Since the land is intended to be uses for "Cropping" (which I assume is farming), the real problem is not the logging, but rather the lax management by farmers or corporations to which this land is entrusted over generations. Even that is manageable, but requires an attention to detail which may or may not be sustainable.
No, you are mistaken. I've always had this sig.