Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by cmn32480 on Thursday May 17 2018, @02:34PM   Printer-friendly
from the pluto-is-gonna-be-pissed dept.

2015 BP519, nicknamed "Caju", is another extreme trans-Neptunian object that points to the existence of Planet Nine. Discovered with data from the Dark Energy Survey, Caju has a relatively large diameter, estimated at around 400-700 km, meaning the object could be a gravitationally rounded dwarf planet. It also has a highly inclined orbit of 54°, which a team of scientists says can be explained by the presence of the hypothetical Planet Nine:

After discovering it, the team tried to investigate 2015 BP519's origins using computer simulations of the Solar System. However, these tests were not able to adequately explain how the object had ended with such an orbit.

But when the team added a ninth planet with properties exactly matching those predicted by the Caltech scientists in 2016, the orbit of 2015 BP519 suddenly made sense. "The second you put Planet Nine in the simulations, not only can you form objects like this object, but you absolutely do," Juliette Becker, a Michigan graduate student and lead author of the study told Quanta.

Some researchers, however, caution that Planet Nine may not be the only explanation for 2015 BP519's strange orbit. Michele Bannister, a planetary astronomer from Queen's University Belfast, in Ireland, who was not involved in the study, told Newsweek that while the latest findings were "a great discovery," other scenarios could account for its tilt. "This object is unusual because it's on a high inclination," she said. "This can be used to maybe tell us some things about its formation process. There are a number of models that suggest you can probably put objects like this into the shape of orbit and the tilt of orbit that we see today."

Also at Quanta Magazine.

Discovery and Dynamical Analysis of an Extreme Trans-Neptunian Object with a High Orbital Inclination (arXiv:1805.05355)

Related: Medieval Records Could Point the Way to Planet Nine


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 4, Interesting) by All Your Lawn Are Belong To Us on Thursday May 17 2018, @05:05PM (1 child)

    by All Your Lawn Are Belong To Us (6553) on Thursday May 17 2018, @05:05PM (#680774) Journal

    Because it is estimated to be at least Magnitude 22? (I think that was because the WISE survey didn't find it and at the estimated distance for Planet Nine of 700 AU's it would have been discovered if it was at least Mag. 22.... I could be all wrong about that.) Pluto is known to be Magnitude 14. Each difference in magnitude corresponds to a 2.512 change of brightness. 22-14 = 7. 2.512^7 = 631.157061373. Hence, "at least 600 times fainter than Pluto." If it were at least magnitude 23 it would be more than 1,500 (1,585.46653817) times fainter than Pluto.

    --
    This sig for rent.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +2  
       Interesting=1, Informative=1, Total=2
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   4  
  • (Score: 2) by All Your Lawn Are Belong To Us on Thursday May 17 2018, @05:09PM

    by All Your Lawn Are Belong To Us (6553) on Thursday May 17 2018, @05:09PM (#680776) Journal

    And yeah, 22-14 is actually 8.... Pluto's apparent magnitude ranges between 13.65 and 15.1 according to Wikipedia, so I'm guessing they took 15 as the definitive number - sorry for the math goof.

    --
    This sig for rent.