Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 17 submissions in the queue.
posted by mrpg on Sunday May 20 2018, @08:00PM   Printer-friendly
from the maybe dept.

Submitted via IRC for SoyCow0245

Last year, AMD introduced Ryzen Pro, a range of processors aimed at corporate desktops rather than consumer systems. Though broadly identical to their consumer counterparts, the Pro chips offer additional guarantees around supply and availability so that corporate fleets can standardize on particular chips without risking a part being discontinued mid-way through their replacement cycle. The Pro chips also carry longer warranties and emphasize certain security and management features that may not be present or enabled in consumer systems.

The first Ryzen Pros had a major omission, however: they didn't include integrated GPUs. Corporate desktops and laptops, typically used for Office, Web browsing, and other low-intensity tasks, overwhelmingly use integrated GPUs rather than discrete ones; they simply don't need anything more powerful. The need for separate GPUs meant that the first-generation Ryzen Pros had only very limited appeal in their target corporate market.

The new processors, however, follow in the footsteps of the Ryzens with integrated Vega graphics launched in February, pairing a single core complex (CCX; a bundle of four cores/eight threads and a shared level 3 cache) with a Vega GPU. This makes them a complete solution for the corporate desktop.

Source: GPU-equipped Ryzen Pros give AMD what it needs to conquer the corporate desktop


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 4, Touché) by frojack on Sunday May 20 2018, @09:03PM (2 children)

    by frojack (1554) on Sunday May 20 2018, @09:03PM (#681958) Journal

    emphasize certain security and management features that may not be present or enabled in consumer systems.

    But can you turn that stuff off when it is eventually found that it can be remotely hackable?

    --
    No, you are mistaken. I've always had this sig.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +2  
       Underrated=1, Touché=1, Total=2
    Extra 'Touché' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   4  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday May 20 2018, @09:33PM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday May 20 2018, @09:33PM (#681969)

    And if you turn it off, will there be a hack to turn it on?

    • (Score: 2) by Freeman on Monday May 21 2018, @04:13PM

      by Freeman (732) on Monday May 21 2018, @04:13PM (#682236) Journal

      Nope, it'll be turned on in the next update that doesn't fix the vulnerability.

      --
      Joshua 1:9 "Be strong and of a good courage; be not afraid, neither be thou dismayed: for the Lord thy God is with thee"