Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Monday May 21 2018, @12:35PM   Printer-friendly
from the Frodo^W-Mickey-Mouse-Lives! dept.

https://boingboing.net/2018/05/18/orrin-fucking-hatch.html

https://www.wired.com/story/congress-latest-move-to-extend-copyright-protection-is-misguided/

Almost exactly 20 years ago, Congress passed the Sonny Bono Copyright Term Extension Act, which extended the term of existing copyrights by 20 years. The Act was the 11th extension in the prior 40 years, timed perfectly to assure that certain famous works, including Mickey Mouse, would not pass into the public domain.

[...] Twenty years later, the fight for term extension has begun anew. Buried in an otherwise harmless act, passed by the House and now being considered in the Senate, this new bill purports to create a new digital performance right—basically the right to control copies of recordings on any digital platform (ever hear of the internet?)—for musical recordings made before 1972. These recordings would now have a new right, protected until 2067, which, for some, means a total term of protection of 144 years. The beneficiaries of this monopoly need do nothing to get the benefit of this gift. They don’t have to make the work available. Nor do they have to register their claims in advance.

That this statute has nothing to do with the constitutional purpose of “promot[ing] Progress” is clear from its very title. The “Compensating Legacy Artists for their Songs, Service, and Important Contributions to Society Act” (or CLASSICS) is as blatant a gift without any public return as is conceivable. And it's not just a gift through cash; it's a gift through a monopoly regulation of speech. Archives with recordings of music from the 1930s or 1940s would now have to clear permission before streaming their musical content even if the underlying work was in the public domain.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by SomeGuy on Monday May 21 2018, @01:14PM

    by SomeGuy (5632) on Monday May 21 2018, @01:14PM (#682141)

    Something along these lines yes.

    The original alleged idea behind copyright was to enrich humanity by encouraging people to create new works resulting in more works available to the people.

    Sitting on a copyright keeping a work locked up in a vault is STEALING from humanity!

    If someone wants to hold on to a copyright for a crazy long time then they should be forced to give something back in return.

    If Walt Disney Corp wants to hold on to Mickey Mouse, then fine. Just pay up and make it worthwhile.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2